Acta Vet. Brno 1987, 56: 449-453
https://doi.org/10.2754/avb198756040449
Antibody Response in Domestic Fowl as Affected by Different Immunization Methods
Individual author index pages
Other articles of these authors
-
Variability of the Lipid Peroxidation Potential in the Erythrocytes of the Domestic Fowl
M. Smutná, E. Petrovský, J. Podaný, A. Konečný, O. Synek
1978, Vol. 47, Issue 3-4, pp. 137-143 -
Studies on the Cell-Mediated Immunity in Chickens Infected with Marek's Disease Virus
V. Benda
1978, Vol. 47, Issue 3-4, pp. 197-201 -
Genetic Differences in Humoral Immune Reactions of Domestic Fowl (Gallus domesticus L.)
E. Petrovský, V. Benda, Jaromíra Kalová
1988, Vol. 57, Issue 3-4, pp. 111-121 -
Glucan Stimulates Antibody Response to a T-dependent Antigen in Chickens
V. Benda, E. Petrovský, A. Hampl, Jaromíra Kalová
1989, Vol. 58, Issue 4, pp. 345-351 -
Evaluation of Wattle Reaction and Antibody Response in Different Chicken Breeds
V. Benda, A. Hampl, Kateřina Trtková
1990, Vol. 59, Issue 3-4, pp. 151-156 -
Phagocytic Activity of Leukocytes in Sheep and Goats
V. Benda, J. Hošpes
1991, Vol. 60, Issue 2, pp. 149-152 -
Fermentation Patterns in Rabbit Caecal Cultures Supplied with Plant Polysaccharides and Lactate
M. Marounek, S. J. Vovk, V. Benda
1997, Vol. 66, Issue 1, pp. 9-13 -
Isolation, Identification and Characterization of Rabbit Caecal Mucinolytic Bacteria
K. Sirotek, E. Santos, V. Benda, M. Marounek
2003, Vol. 72, Issue 3, pp. 365-370