Acta Vet. Brno 2002, 71: 133-136

https://doi.org/10.2754/avb200271010133

Effects of Disease on Farm Animal Welfare

D. M. Broom, M. J. Corke

Crossref Cited-by Linking

  • Kramer Collin, Page Jessica R., Flint Jaylene, Flint Mark: Using Animal Welfare Framing as an Effective Approach to Communicating Climate Change\u2014A Review. Veterinary Medicine & Sci 2025, 11. <https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.70154>
  • Kim Jee Hyun, Kang Hyejin, Min Mi-Sook, Ma Seung Aee, Cho Je-Yoel: Comprehensive welfare assessment of Eurasian otters (Lutra lutra) in South Korean Zoos using the modified Animal Welfare Assessment Grid (AWAG) and hair cortisol concentration. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2025, 288, 106665. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106665>
  • Edwardes F., van der Voort M., Rodenburg T.B., Hogeveen H.: A new approach and insights on modelling the impact of production diseases on dairy cow welfare. animal 2024, 18, 101056. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2023.101056>
  • Steeneveld W., van den Borne B.H.P., Kok A., Rodenburg T.B., Hogeveen H.: Invited review: Quantifying multiple burdens of dairy cattle production diseases and reproductive inefficiency\u2014Current knowledge and proposed metrics. Journal of Dairy Science 2024, 107, 8765. <https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2023-24538>
  • Malá Gabriela, Novák Pavel, Prášek Josef, Zábranský Luboš: The effect of group housing on behaviour, growth performance, and health of dairy calves. Acta Vet. Brno 2023, 92, 109. <https://doi.org/10.2754/avb202392020109>
  • Silva Welligton Conceição da, Silva Jamile Andréa Rodrigues da, Camargo-Júnior Raimundo Nonato Colares, Silva Éder Bruno Rebelo da, Santos Maria Roseane Pereira dos, Viana Rinaldo Batista, Silva André Guimarães Maciel e, Silva Cleidson Manoel Gomes da, Lourenço-Júnior José de Brito: Animal welfare and effects of per-female stress on male and cattle reproduction—A review. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10. <https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1083469>
  • Ertaş Tuba Damla, Kahvecioğlu Kifayet Oya, Erdoğan Serkan: Morphological Aspects and Microscopic Analyses of Fibrous Tunic and Uveal Components in Bovine Eye. Microscopy and Microanalysis 2022, 28, 1794. <https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927622000812>
  • Becker V.A.E., Stamer E., Spiekers H., Thaller G.: Genetic parameters for dry matter intake, energy balance, residual energy intake, and liability to diseases in German Holstein and Fleckvieh dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 2022, 105, 9738. <https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-22083>
  • Hemsworth Paul H.: Cage production and laying hen welfare. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2021, 61, 821. <https://doi.org/10.1071/AN19609>
  • Vigors Belinda, Ewing David A., Lawrence Alistair B., Frewer Lynn Jayne: Happy or healthy? How members of the public prioritise farm animal health and natural behaviours. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0247788. <https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247788>
  • Becker V.A.E., Stamer E., Thaller G.: Liability to diseases and their relation to dry matter intake and energy balance in German Holstein and Fleckvieh dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 2021, 104, 628. <https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18579>
  • Valkova Lenka, Vecerek Vladimir, Voslarova Eva, Kaluza Michal, Takacova Daniela: The Welfare of Cattle, Sheep, Goats and Pigs from the Perspective of Traumatic Injuries Detected at Slaughterhouse Postmortem Inspection. Animals 2021, 11, 1406. <https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051406>
  • Bastard Jonathan, Andraud Mathieu, Chauvin Claire, Glaser Philippe, Opatowski Lulla, Temime Laura: Dynamics of livestock-associated methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pig movement networks: Insight from mathematical modeling and French data. Epidemics 2020, 31, 100389. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epidem.2020.100389>
  • Tilbrook A. J., Fisher A. D.: Stress, health and the welfare of laying hens. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2020, 61, 931. <https://doi.org/10.1071/AN19666>
  • Stubsjøen Solveig Marie, Sørheim Kristin, Chincarini Matteo, Bohlin Jon, Brunberg Emma, Fuchs Boris, Palme Rupert, Grøva Lise: Exploring hair cortisone concentration as a novel tool to assess chronic stress in sheep with tick-borne fever. Small Ruminant Research 2018, 164, 110. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.05.009>
  • Mora-Medina Patricia, Berdugo-Gutiérrez Jesús Alfredo, Mota-Rojas Daniel, Ruiz-Buitrago Jhon Didier, Nava-Adame José, Guerrero-Legarreta Isabel: Behaviour and Welfare of Dairy Buffaloes: Pasture or Confinement?. J Buf Sci 2018, 7, 43. <https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2018.07.03.2>
  • Stubsjøen Solveig M., Bohlin Jon, Dahl Ellen, Knappe-Poindecker Maren, Fjeldaas Terje, Lepschy Michael, Palme Rupert, Langbein Jan, Ropstad Erik: Assessment of chronic stress in sheep (part I): The use of cortisol and cortisone in hair as non-invasive biological markers. Small Ruminant Research 2015, 132, 25. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2015.09.015>
  • EFSA's assistance for the 2015 Codex Committee on Residues of Veterinary Drugs in Food (CCRVDF) in relation to rBST. EFS3 2015, 12. <https://doi.org/10.2903/sp.efsa.2015.EN-828>
  • Costa Annamaria, Ismayilova Gunel, Borgonovo Federica, Leroy Toon, Berckmans Daniel, Guarino Marcella: The use of image analysis as a new approach to assess behaviour classification in a pig barn. Acta Vet. Brno 2013, 82, 25. <https://doi.org/10.2754/avb201382010025>
  • Segner Helmut, Sundh Henrik, Buchmann Kurt, Douxfils Jessica, Sundell Kristina Snuttan, Mathieu Cédric, Ruane Neil, Jutfelt Fredrik, Toften Hilde, Vaughan Lloyd: Health of farmed fish: its relation to fish welfare and its utility as welfare indicator. Fish Physiol Biochem 2012, 38, 85. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-011-9517-9>
  • Olechnowicz J., Jaskowski J.M.: Behaviour of lame cows: a review. Vet. Med. 2011, 56, 581. <https://doi.org/10.17221/4435-VETMED>
  • Cullinane Mary, O'Sullivan Edmond, Collins Gerald, Collins Daniel M, More Simon J: A review of bovine cases consigned under veterinary certification to emergency and casualty slaughter in Ireland during 2006 to 2008. Ir Vet J 2010, 63. <https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-0481-63-9-568>
  • Scientific report on the effects of farming systems on dairy cow welfare and disease. EFSA Journal 2009, 7, 1143r. <https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1143r>
  • Goossens X, Sobry L, Ödberg F, Tuyttens F, Maes D, De Smet S, Nevens F, Opsomer G, Lommelen F, Geers R: A population-based on-farm evaluation protocol for comparing the welfare of pigs between farms. Anim. welf. 2008, 17, 35. <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962728600031961>
  • Sarica M., Boga S., Yamak U.S.: The effects of space allowance on egg yield, egg quality and plumage condition of laying hens in battery cages. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 53, 345. <https://doi.org/10.17221/349-CJAS>
  • Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Animal Health and Welfare on a request from the Commission related to animal health and welfare in fattening pigs in relation to housing and husbandry. EFSA Journal 2007, 5, 564. <https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2007.564>
  • Animal health and welfare aspects of different housing and husbandry systems for adult breeding boars, pregnant, farrowing sows and unweaned piglets - Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare. EFSA Journal 2007, 5, 572. <https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2007.572>
  • The risks associated with tail biting in pigs and possible means to reduce the need for tail docking considering the different housing and husbandry systems - Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare. EFSA Journal 2007, 5, 611. <https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2007.611>
  • Broom Donald Maurice: Behaviour and welfare in relation to pathology. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2006, 97, 73. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.11.019>
  • Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) on a request from the Commission related with the risks of poor welfare in intensive calf farming systems. EFSA Journal 2006, 4, 366. <https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2006.366>
  • Windig Jack J., Calus Mario P.L., de Jong Gerben, Veerkamp Roel F.: The association between somatic cell count patterns and milk production prior to mastitis. Livestock Production Science 2005, 96, 291. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.02.009>
  • Opinion of the Scientific Panel on biological hazards (BIOHAZ) on vis-à-vis biological risks of biogas and compost treatment standards of animal by-products (ABP). EFSA Journal 2005, 3, 264. <https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2005.264>
  • Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) on a request from the Commission related to welfare of weaners and rearing pigs: effects of different space allowances and floor. EFSA Journal 2005, 3, 268. <https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2005.268>
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo