Acta Vet. Brno 2004, 73: 513-519

https://doi.org/10.2754/avb200473040513

Probiotic Properties of Enterococcus faecium EF9296 Strain Isolated from Silage

M. Marciňáková, M. Simonová, A. Lauková

Crossref Cited-by Linking

  • Jiang Huifang, Okoye Charles Obinwanne, Wu Yanfang, Gao Lu, Li Xia, Wang Yongli, Jiang Jianxiong: Silage pathogens and biological control agents: effects, action mechanisms, challenges and prospects. BioControl 2024, 69, 1. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-023-10236-z>
  • Carvajal E., Contreras S., Díaz W., Martinez-Bello D., McCown M., Ardila Y., Vásquez María Cristina: Enterococcus isolated from poultry intestine for potential probiotic use. Vet World 2023, 1605. <https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2023.1605-1614>
  • Nalla Kirankumar, Manda Naresh Kumar, Dhillon Harmeet Singh, Kanade Santosh R., Rokana Namita, Hess Matthias, Puniya Anil Kumar: Impact of Probiotics on Dairy Production Efficiency. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13. <https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.805963>
  • Hu Zongfu, Ma Deying, Niu Huaxin, Chang Jie, Yu Jianhua, Tong Qing, Li Shuguo: Enzyme additives influence bacterial communities of Medicago sativa silage as determined by Illumina sequencing. AMB Expr 2021, 11. <https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-020-01158-5>
  • Vadassery Divya Haridas, Pillai Devika: Quorum quenching potential of Enterococcus faecium QQ12 isolated from gastrointestinal tract of Oreochromis niloticus and its application as a probiotic for the control of Aeromonas hydrophila infection in goldfish Carassius auratus (Linnaeus 1758). Braz J Microbiol 2020, 51, 1333. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-020-00230-3>
  • Muck R.E., Nadeau E.M.G., McAllister T.A., Contreras-Govea F.E., Santos M.C., Kung L.: Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives. Journal of Dairy Science 2018, 101, 3980. <https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13839>
  • Saint-Cyr Manuel J., Guyard-Nicodème Muriel, Messaoudi Soumaya, Chemaly Marianne, Cappelier Jean-Michel, Dousset Xavier, Haddad Nabila: Recent Advances in Screening of Anti-Campylobacter Activity in Probiotics for Use in Poultry. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7. <https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00553>
  • Marciňáková Miroslava, Klingberg Trine Danø, Lauková Andrea, Budde Birgitte Bjørn: The effect of pH, bile and calcium on the adhesion ability of probiotic enterococci of animal origin to the porcine jejunal epithelial cell line IPEC-J2. Anaerobe 2010, 16, 120. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2009.05.001>
  • Jalč D., Lauková A., Simonová M., Váradyová Z., Homolka P.: The use of bacterial inoculants for grass silage: their effects on nutrient composition and fermentation parameters in grass silages. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 54, 84. <https://doi.org/10.17221/1665-CJAS>
  • Marciňáková M., Lauková A., Simonová M., Strompfová V., Koréneková B., Naď P.: A new probiotic and bacteriocin-producing strain of Enterococcus faecium EF9296 and its use in grass ensiling. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 53, 335. <https://doi.org/10.17221/348-CJAS>
  • Lauková A., Švec P., Strompfová V., Štětina V., Sedláček I.: Properties of the strainsEnterococcus haemoperoxidus andE. moraviensis, new species among enterococci. Folia Microbiol 2007, 52. <https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02931309>
  • Simonová M., Lauková A.: Bacteriocin Activity of Enterococci from Rabbits. Vet Res Commun 2007, 31, 143. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-006-3411-4>
  • Jouany J.-P., Morgavi D.P.: Use of ‘natural’ products as alternatives to antibiotic feed additives in ruminant production. Animal 2007, 1, 1443. <https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731107000742>
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo