Acta Vet. Brno 2009, 78: 93-98

https://doi.org/10.2754/avb200978010093

Stress in Broiler Chickens Due to Acute Noise Exposure

Petr Chloupek1, Eva Voslářová1, Jan Chloupek2, Iveta Bedáňová1, Vladimíra Pištěková1, Vladimír Večerek1

1Department of Veterinary Public Health and Toxicology
2Department of Nutrition, Livestock Breeding and Animal Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences in Brno, Czech Republic

Received March 4, 2008
Accepted October 1, 2008

Crossref Cited-by Linking

  • Engel Margret S., Young Robert J., Davies William J., Waddington David, Wood Michael D.: A Systematic Review of Anthropogenic Noise Impact on Avian Species. Curr Pollution Rep 2024, 10, 684. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-024-00329-3>
  • Wan Shuang-shuang, Li Xue-yuan, Liu Si-rui, Tang Shu: The function of carnosic acid in lipopolysaccharides-induced hepatic and intestinal inflammation in poultry. Poultry Science 2024, 103, 103415. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.103415>
  • Liu Yinkun, Liu Sirui, Wan Shuangshuang, Li Zixin, Li Hao, Tang Shu: Anti-inflammatory properties of Bacillus pumilus TS1 in lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory damage in broilers. Animal Biotechnology 2024, 35. <https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2024.2418516>
  • Ncho Chris Major, Berdos Janine I., Gupta Vaishali, Rahman Attaur, Mekonnen Kefala Taye, Bakhsh Allah: Abiotic stressors in poultry production: A comprehensive review. Animal Physiology Nutrition 2024. <https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.14032>
  • Mandiga Aravind, Li Guoming, Wilson Jeanna L., Liu Tianming, Bodempudi Venkat Umesh Chandra, Mason Jacob Hunter: Quantifying Nesting Behavior Metrics of Broiler Breeder Hens with Computationally Efficient Image Processing Algorithms and Big Data Analytics. AgriEngineering 2024, 6, 3672. <https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering6040209>
  • Viigipuu Riin, Mägi Marko, Tilgar Vallo: Great tits alter incubation behaviour in noisy environments. J Ethol 2023, 41, 39. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-022-00765-y>
  • Adebayo Segun, Aworinde Halleluyah O., Akinwunmi Akinwale O., Alabi Olufemi M., Ayandiji Adebamiji, Sakpere Aderonke B., Adeyemo Adetoye, Oyebamiji Abel K., Olaide Oke, Kizito Echentama: Enhancing poultry health management through machine learning-based analysis of vocalization signals dataset. Data in Brief 2023, 50, 109528. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.109528>
  • Hanafi S.A., Zulkifli I., Ramiah S.K., Chung E.L.T., Kamil R., Awad E.A.: Prenatal auditory stimulation induces physiological stress responses in developing embryos and newly hatched chicks. Poultry Science 2023, 102, 102390. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102390>
  • Cao Shiwen, Yang Fengping, Wu Ruiyong, Zhang Xueyu, Ye Manhong, Wei Wanhong, Campbell Dana: Beneficial effects of instrumental music on the production performance of Xiandao green-shell layers housed under different stocking densities. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2023, 63, 664. <https://doi.org/10.1071/AN22288>
  • Kearton Tellisa R., Almeida Amelia, Cowley Frances C., Tait L. Amy, Campbell Dana: Review of the potential impacts of freight rail corridors on livestock welfare and production. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2023, 64. <https://doi.org/10.1071/AN23039>
  • Nielsen Søren Saxmose, Alvarez Julio, Bicout Dominique Joseph, Calistri Paolo, Canali Elisabetta, Drewe Julian Ashley, Garin‐Bastuji Bruno, Gonzales Rojas Jose Luis, Gortázar Schmidt Christian, Herskin Mette, Miranda Chueca Miguel Ángel, Padalino Barbara, Pasquali Paolo, Roberts Helen Clare, Spoolder Hans, Stahl Karl, Velarde Antonio, Viltrop Arvo, Winckler Christoph, Estevez Inmaculada, Guinebretière Maryse, Rodenburg Bas, Schrader Lars, Tiemann Inga, Van Niekerk Thea, Ardizzone Michele, Ashe Sean, Hempen Michaela, Mosbach‐Schulz Olaf, Rojo Gimeno Cristina, Van der Stede Yves, Vitali Marika, Michel Virginie: Welfare of laying hens on farm. EFS2 2023, 21. <https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7789>
  • Berlow Mae, Wada Haruka, Derryberry Elizabeth P.: Experimental Exposure to Noise Alters Gut Microbiota in a Captive Songbird. Microb Ecol 2022, 84, 1264. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-021-01924-3>
  • Hawkins Emilie, Papworth Sarah: Little Evidence to Support the Risk–Disturbance Hypothesis as an Explanation for Responses to Anthropogenic Noise by Pygmy Marmosets (Cebuella niveiventris) at a Tourism site in the Peruvian Amazon. Int J Primatol 2022, 43, 1110. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-022-00297-9>
  • Connelly Farley, Hall Michelle L., Johnsson Robin D., Elliot-Kerr Shona, Dow Belinda R., Lesku John A., Mulder Raoul A.: Urban noise does not affect cognitive performance in wild Australian magpies. Animal Behaviour 2022, 188, 35. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2022.03.021>
  • Pascale Antonio, Mancini Simona, Coelho Margarida C., Guarnaccia Claudio: Acoustic Indicators for Motor Race Noise: Definition, Validation, and Tests in Simulated and Real Races. Applied Acoustics 2022, 200, 109071. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.109071>
  • YAYLI Büşra, KILIÇ İlker: Determination and Evaluation of Noise Pollution in Layer Hen House: A Bursa Case Study. Uluslararası Tarım ve Yaban Hayatı Bilimleri Dergisi 2022, 8, 542. <https://doi.org/10.24180/ijaws.1162788>
  • Mitin Helen, Zulkifli Idrus, Che Jamri Muhammad Hazim, Zamzuri Nur Athirah, Samian Nurain Aliah, Hussein Aimi Nabilah, Goh Yong Meng, Sazili Awis Qurni: Alleviation of Catching and Crating Stress by Dietary Supplementation of Bacillus subtilis in Pekin Ducks. Animals 2022, 12, 3479. <https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12243479>
  • Ginovart-Panisello Gerardo José, Iriondo Sanz Ignasi, Panisello Monjo Tesa, Riva Silvia, Garriga Dicuzzo Tomas, Abancens Escuer Eva, Alsina-Pagès Rosa Ma: Trend and Representativeness of Acoustic Features of Broiler Chicken Vocalisations Related to CO2. Applied Sciences 2022, 12, 10480. <https://doi.org/10.3390/app122010480>
  • Names Gabrielle R., Krause Jesse S., Schultz Elizabeth M., Angelier Frédéric, Parenteau Charline, Ribout Cécile, Hahn Thomas P., Wingfield John C.: Relationships between avian malaria resilience and corticosterone, testosterone and prolactin in a Hawaiian songbird. General and Comparative Endocrinology 2021, 308, 113784. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2021.113784>
  • Cronin Greg M., Glatz Phil C.: Causes of feather pecking and subsequent welfare issues for the laying hen: a review. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2020, 61, 990. <https://doi.org/10.1071/AN19628>
  • Hawkins Carly E., Ritrovato Isabel T., Swaddle John P.: Traffic noise alters individual social connectivity, but not space-use, of Red-backed Fairywrens. Emu - Austral Ornithology 2020, 120, 313. <https://doi.org/10.1080/01584197.2020.1830706>
  • Hedlund Louise, Whittle Rosemary, Jensen Per: Effects of commercial hatchery processing on short- and long-term stress responses in laying hens. Sci Rep 2019, 9. <https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-38817-y>
  • Steiner Aline R., Axiak Flammer Shannon, Beausoleil Ngaio J., Berg Charlotte, Bettschart-Wolfensberger Regula, García Pinillos Rebeca, Golledge Huw D.R., Marahrens Michael, Meyer Robert, Schnitzer Tobias, Toscano Michael J., Turner Patricia V., Weary Daniel M., Gent Thomas C.: Humanely Ending the Life of Animals: Research Priorities to Identify Alternatives to Carbon Dioxide. Animals 2019, 9, 911. <https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9110911>
  • Zidar Josefina, Campderrich Irene, Jansson Emelie, Wichman Anette, Winberg Svante, Keeling Linda, Løvlie Hanne: Environmental complexity buffers against stress-induced negative judgement bias in female chickens. Sci Rep 2018, 8. <https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23545-6>
  • Grilli C., Loschi A.R., Rea S., Stocchi R., Leoni L., Conti F.: Welfare indicators during broiler slaughtering. British Poultry Science 2015, 56, 1. <https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2014.991274>
  • Karwowska Małgorzata, Mikołajczak Jan, Dolatowski Zbigniew Józef, Borowski Sylwester: The Effect Of Varying Distances From The Wind Turbine On Meat Quality Of Growing-Finishing Pigs. Annals of Animal Science 2015, 0. <https://doi.org/10.1515/aoas-2015-0051>
  • FIDAN EVRIM DERELI, TÜRKYILMAZ MEHMET KENAN, NAZLIGÜL AHMET: Effects of noise and light intensities on stress and fear reactions in broilers. Indian J of Anim Sci 2015, 85. <https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v85i12.54406>
  • Lima Karla A. O., Nääs Irenilza de A., Garcia Rodrigo G., Borille Rodrigo, Caldara Fabiana R.: Impact of different light sources on broiler rearing environment. Eng. Agríc. 2014, 34, 428. <https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162014000300006>
  • Bergoug H., Burel C., Guinebretière M., Tong Q., Roulston N., Romanini C.E.B., Exadaktylos V., Mcgonnell I.M., Demmers T.G.M., Verhelst R., Bahr C., Berckmans D., Eterradossi N.: Effect of pre-incubation and incubation conditions on hatchability, hatch time and hatch window, and effect of post-hatch handling on chick quality at placement. World's Poultry Science Journal 2013, 69, 313. <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933913000329>
  • Jones Amy R., Bizo Lewis A., Foster T. Mary: Domestic hen chicks’ conditioned place preferences for sound. Behavioural Processes 2012, 89, 30. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2011.10.007>
  • Chapter 6: Constraints on acoustic signaling among birds breeding in secondary cavities: The effects of weather, cavity material, and noise on sound propagation. Ornithological Monographs 2012, 74, 63. <https://doi.org/10.1525/om.2012.74.1.63>
  • Kight Caitlin R., Swaddle John P.: How and why environmental noise impacts animals: an integrative, mechanistic review. Ecology Letters 2011, 14, 1052. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01664.x>
  • VOSLAROVA Eva, CHLOUPEK Petr, CHLOUPEK Jan, BEDANOVA Iveta, PISTEKOVA Vladimira, VECEREK Vladimir: The effects of chronic intermittent noise exposure on broiler chicken performance. Animal Science Journal 2011, 82, 601. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2011.00877.x>
  • Scientific Opinion Concerning the Welfare of Animals during Transport. EFSA Journal 2011, 9, 1966. <https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2011.1966>
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo