Acta Vet. Brno 2009, 78: 667-671

https://doi.org/10.2754/avb200978040667

ELISA for Detection of Soya Proteins in Meat Products

Eva Renčová1, Bohuslava Tremlová2

1Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
2Department of Vegetable Food and Production, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, Veterinary and Pharmaceutical University Brno, Czech Republic

Received July 30, 2008
Accepted June 30, 2009

Crossref Cited-by Linking

  • Mehmetukaj Dafina, Bytyçi Xhavit, Cana Armend, Gashi-Zogëjani Vlora, Shandro-Zeqiri Malbora, Bajraktari Drita, Jankuloski Dean, Hajrulai-Musliu Zehra: Presence of Soya in Industrial and Homemade Sausage Production in Kosovo and Its Reflection on Fatty Acid Profile. Separations 2024, 11, 302. <https://doi.org/10.3390/separations11100302>
  • Kru\u017eíková Kamila Novotná, Popelková Tereza, T\u0161ponová Zuzana, Doubková Veronika, Dole\u017eelová Petra, Laichmannová Lucie: Detection of soy in food from the Czech market using ELISA and PCR methods. Czech J. Food Sci. 2022, 40, 375. <https://doi.org/10.17221/100/2021-CJFS>
  • Segura-Gil Isabel, Galan-Malo Patricia, Mata Luis, Tobajas Ana P., Calvo Miguel, Sánchez Lourdes, Pérez María D.: Influence of different extraction conditions on the detection of glycinin and β-conglycinin in model processed foods by ELISA. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A 2020, 37, 1087. <https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2020.1757163>
  • Spychaj Anita, Pospiech Edward, Iwańska Ewa, Montowska Magdalena: Detection of allergenic additives in processed meat products. J Sci Food Agric 2018, 98, 4807. <https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9083>
  • Tafvizi Farzaneh, Hashemzadegan Masumeh: Specific identification of chicken and soybean fraud in premium burgers using multiplex-PCR method. J Food Sci Technol 2016, 53, 816. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-1771-x>
  • Vlachos Antonios, Arvanitoyannis Ioannis S., Tserkezou Persefoni: An Updated Review of Meat Authenticity Methods and Applications. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 2016, 56, 1061. <https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2012.691573>
  • Jiang Tao-Ling, Cai Qiu-Feng, Shen Jian-Dong, Huang Ming-Jie, Zhang Ling-Jing, Liu Guang-Ming, Cao Min-Jie: Establishment of immunological methods for the detection of soybean proteins in surimi products. LWT - Food Science and Technology 2015, 64, 344. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.06.005>
  • Jankovic Vesna, Matekalo-Sverak Vesna, Lakicevic Brankica, Spiric Danka, Petronijevic Radivoj: Soybean and Gluten in Meat Products - Consumer Protection Strategy. Procedia Food Science 2015, 5, 121. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profoo.2015.09.033>
  • Sadeghinezhad Javad, Hajimohammadi Bahador, Izadi Farkhondeh, Yarmahmoudi Fatemeh, Latorre Rocco: Evaluation of the morphologic method for the detection of animal and herbal content in minced meat. Czech J. Food Sci. 2015, 33, 564. <https://doi.org/10.17221/167/2015-CJFS>
  • Řezáčová Lukášková Zuzana, Pospiech Matěj, Tremlová Bohuslava, Renčová Eva, Petrášová Michaela: Quantitative immunohistochemical method for detection of wheat protein in model sausage. Acta Vet. Brno 2014, 83, S71. <https://doi.org/10.2754/avb201483S10S71>
  • Cawthorn Donna-Mareè, Steinman Harris A., Hoffman Louwrens C.: A high incidence of species substitution and mislabelling detected in meat products sold in South Africa. Food Control 2013, 32, 440. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.01.008>
  • Lukášková Z. Řezáčová, Tremlová B., Pospiech M., Renčová E., Randulová Z., Steinhauser L., Reichová A., Bednář J.: Comparison of immunohistochemical, histochemical and immunochemical methods for the detection of wheat protein allergens in meat samples and cooked, dry, raw and fermented sausage samples. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A 2011, 28, 817. <https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2011.572292>
  • Pospiech Matej, Tremlová Bohuslava, Renčová Eva, Randulová Zdeňka, Řezáčová Lukášková Zuzana, Pokorná Jana: Comparison of the results of the ELISA, histochemical, and immunohistochemical detection of soya proteins in meat products. Czech J. Food Sci. 2011, 29, 471. <https://doi.org/10.17221/209/2010-CJFS>
  • Current Awareness in Phytochemical Analysis. Phytochemical Analysis 2010, 21, 616. <https://doi.org/10.1002/pca.1164>
Crossref Cited-by Linking logo