Acta Vet. Brno 2010, 79: 19-26

https://doi.org/10.2754/avb201079010019

Broiler Response to Open Field Test in Early Ontogeny

Linda Balážová, Eva Baranyiová

Department of Veterinary Public Health and Toxicolgy, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Science in Brno, Czech Republic

Received September 11, 2008
Accepted September 8, 2009

References

1. Andrew, RJ 1964: Vocalisation in chicks, and the concept of stimulus contrast. Anim Behav 12: 64-76 <https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(64)90105-8>
2. Andrew RJ, Brennan A 1983: The lateralization of fear behaviour in the male domestic chick: A developmental study. Anim Behav 31: 1166-1176 <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(83)80023-2>
3. Andrew RJ, Brennan A 1984: Sex differences in lateralization in the domestic chick. Neuropsychologia 22: 503-509 <https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(84)90045-9>
4. Baranyiová E 1972: Influence of deutectomy, food intake and fasting on the digestive tract dimensions in chickens after hatching. Acta vet. Brno 41: 373-384
5. Barbato GF 1994: Genetic-control of food-intake in chickens. J Nutr 124: S1341-S1348 <https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/124.suppl_8.1341S>
6. Bateson, PPG 1966: The characteristics and context of imprinting. Biol Rev 41: 177-220 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1966.tb01489.x>
7. Bessei W 1992: Das Verhalten von Broilern unter intensiven Haltungsbedigungen. Arch Geflugelkd 56: 1-7
8. Bizeray D, Leterrier C, Constantin P, Le Pape G, Faure JM 2002: Typology of activity bouts and effect of fearfulness on behaviour in meat-type chickens. Behav Process 58: 45-55 <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(01)00210-8>
9. Bokkers EAM 2004: Behavioural motivations and abilities in broilers. PhD Thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands, 156 p.
10. Broom DM 1969: Reactions of chicks to visual changes during the first ten days after hatching. Anim Behav 17: 307-315 <https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(69)90015-3>
11. Bubier NE 1996: The behavioural priorities of laying hens: the effects of two methods of environment enrichment on time budget. Behav Processes 37: 239-249 <https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6357(96)00018-6>
12. Campler M, Jöngren M, Jensen P 2009: Fearfulness in red junglefowl and domesticated White Leghorn chickens. Behav Processes 81: 39-43 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2008.12.018>
13. Danbury TC, Weeks CA, Chambers JP, Waterman-Pearson AE, Kestin SC 2001: Self-selection of the analgesic drug carprofen by lame broiler chickens. Vet Rec 146: 307-311 <https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.146.11.307>
14. Faure JM, Jones RB, Bessei W 1983: Fear and social motivation as factors in open-field behavior of the domestic chick. Biol Behav 8: 103-116
15. Franck D 1996: Etologie. Karolinum, Praha, 323 p.
16. Freeman BM 1964: The emergence of the homoethermic-metabolic response in the fowl (Gallus domesticus). Comp Biochem Physiol 13: 413-422 <https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-406X(64)90033-7>
17. Freeman BM 1965: The importance of glycogen at the termination of the embryonic existence of Gallus domesticus. Comp Biochem Physiol 14: 217-222 <https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-406X(65)90197-0>
18. Freeman BM 1970: Thermoregulatory mechanisms of the neonate fowl. Comp Biochem Physiol 33: 219-230 <https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-406X(70)90346-4>
19. Forkman B, Boissy A, Meunier-Salaun MC, Canali E, Jones RB 2007: A critical review of fear tests used on cattle, pigs, sheep, poultry and horses. Physiol Behav 92: 340-374 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.03.016>
20. Ginsburg, HJ, Braud, WG, Taylor, RD 1974: Inhibition of distress vocalizations in the open-field as a function of hightened fear or arousal in domestic fowl (Gallus gallus). Anim Behav 22: 745-749 <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(74)80027-8>
21. Graves HB 1973: Early social responses in Gallus: a functional analysis. Science 182: 937-938 <https://doi.org/10.1126/science.182.4115.937>
22. Heiblum R, Aizenstein, O, Gvaryahu, G, Voet, H, Robinzon, B, Snapir, N 1998: Tonic immobility and open field responses in domestic fowl chicks during the first week of life. Appl Anim Behav Sci 60: 347-357 <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00157-9>
23. Hinde RA 1970: Behavioural habituation. In: HORN, G, HINDE, RA (Eds): Short-term changes in neural activity and behaviour, Cambridge University Press, pp. 76-80
24. Hogan JA, Bolhuis JJ 2005: The development of behaviour: trends since Tinbergen (1963). Anim Biol 55: 371-398 <https://doi.org/10.1163/157075605774840914>
25. Jones RB 1977a: Sex and strain differences in the open-field responses of the domestic chick. Appl Anim Ethol 3: 255-261 <https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3762(77)90006-2>
26. Jones RB 1977b: Repeated exposure of the domestic chick to a novel environment: Effects on behavioural responses. Behav Process 2: 163-173 <https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6357(77)90018-3>
27. Jones RB 1983: Fear responses in domestic chicks as a function of the social environment. Behav Process 8: 309-325 <https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6357(83)90021-9>
28. Jones RB, Mills AD 1983: Estimation of fear in two lines of the domestic chick: correlations between various methods. Behav. Processes 8: 243-253 <https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6357(83)90015-3>
29. Jones RB 1989: Development of alleviation of fear in poultry. In: Faure, JM and Mills D (Eds): Proc. Third Eur Symposium of Poultry Welfare. Tours, France, pp. 123-136
30. Jones RB 1996: Fear and adaptability in poultry: insights, implications and imperatives. World´s Poultry Sci J 52: 131-174 <https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19960013>
31. Julian RJ 1998: Rapid growth problems and skeletal deformities in broilers. Poultry Sci 77: 1773-1780 <https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.12.1773>
32. Kestin SC, Gordon SH, Su G, Sørensen P 2001: Relationships in broiler chickens betwen lamenes, liveweight, growth rate and age. Vet Rec 131: 190-194 <https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.131.9.190>
33. Kestin SC, Su, G, Sorensen P 1992: Different commercial brolier crosses have different susceptibilities to leg weakness. Poultry Sci 78: 1085-1090 <https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/78.8.1085>
34. Lewis NJ, Hurnik JF 1990: Locomotion of broiler chickens in floor pens. Poultry Sci 69: 1087-1093 <https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0691087>
35. Lilburn, M 1994: Skeletal growth of commercial poultry species. Poultry Sci 73: 897-903 <https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0730897>
36. Lindqvist Ch, Lind J, Jensen P 2009: Effect of domestication on food deprivation-induced behaviour in red junglefowl, Gallus gallus, and White Leghorn layers. Anim Behav 77: 893-899 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.12.015>
37. Martínek Z, Lát J 1968a: Interindividual differences in habituation of spontaneous reactions of dogs to a new environment. Physiol bohemoslov 17: 329
38. Martínek Z, Lát J 1968b: Ontogenetic differences in spontaneous reactions of dogs to a new environment. Physiol bohemoslov 17 : 545
39. Martínek Z,. Novacký M 1977. Habituation of behavioural reactions in domestic pig (Sus scrofa f. domestica). Physiol bohemoslov 26: 459
40. Marx G, Leppelt J, Ellendorf F 2001: Vocalisation in chicks (Gallus gallus dom.) during stepwise social isolation. Appl Anim Behav Sci 75: 61-74 <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00180-0>
41. Montevecchi WA, Gallup, GG Jr., Dunlap, WP 1973: The peep vocalization in group reared chicks (Gallus domesticus): its relation to fear. Anim Behav 21: 116-123 <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(73)80049-1>
42. Newberry RC, Hall JW 1990: Use of pen space by broiler chickens: effects of age and pen size. Appl Anim behav Sci 25: 125-136 <https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(90)90075-O>
43. Newberry RC 1999: Exploratory behaviour of young domestic fowl. Appl Anim Behav Sci 63: 311-321 <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00016-7>
44. Novacký M, Czako M 1987: Základy etológie (In Slovak; The Basics of Ethology). SPN, Bratislava 178 p.
45. Novacký M, Liday I 1994: Sexual differences in CNS excitability and habituation of pigs (Sus scrofa f. domestica). Živoč výr 39: 605-612
46. Novacký M, Liday I 1995: Differences in CNS excitability and in habituation of pigs of Hampshire, Landrace, Duroc and Large White breeds. Živoč výr 40: 357-362
47. Okuliarová M, Košťál Ľ, Zeman M 2006: Increased testosterone content in egg differentially influences behaviour of Japanese quail during ontogeny. In: Yahav S. Tzschentke B (Eds): New Insights into Fundamental Physiology and Perinatal Adaptation of Domestic Fowl. Nottingham University Press, United Kingdom, pp. 173-180,
48. Price EO 1999: Behavioral development in animals undergoing domestication. Appl Anim Behav Sci 65: 245-271 <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00087-8>
49. Rauw WM, Kanis E, Noordhuizen-Stassen EN,. Grommers FJ 1998: Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: a review. Livestock Prod Sci 56: 15-33 <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(98)00147-X>
50. Reiter K, Bessei W 1998: Einfluss der Laufaktivität aud die Knochenentwicklung und Beinschäden bei Broilern. Arch Geflugelkd 62: 247-253
51. Rodenburg TB, Buitenhuis AJ, Ask B, Uitdehaag KA, Koene P, Van der Poel JJ, Bovenhuis H 2003: Heritability of feather pecking and open-field response of laying hens at two different ages. Poultry Sci 82: 861-867 <https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.6.861>
52. Rogers LJ 1995: The Development of Brain and Behaviour in the Chicken. CAB International, Wallingford, 273 p.
53. Sanotra GB, Lund JA, Flagstad A, Vestergaard KS 2001: Association between leg pain and reduced dust-bathing behaviour in broiler chickens. Proceedings of the 35th International Congress of the ISAE. UCLA Davis, p. 215
54. Schütz KE, Jensen P 2001: Effect of resource allocation on behavioural strategies: a comparison of red junglefowl (Gallus gallus) and two domesticated breeds of poultry. Ethology 107: 753-765 <https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.00703.x>
55. Vestergaard, KS, Kruijt, JP, Hogan, JA 1993: Feather pecking and chronic fear in groups of red jungle fowl: their relations to dustbathing, rearing environment and social status. Anim Behav 45: 1127-1140 <https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1993.1137>
56. Vestergaard KS, Sanotra GS 1999: Relationships between leg disorders and changes in the behaviour in broiler chickens. Vet Rec 144: 205-209 <https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.144.8.205>
front cover
  • ISSN 0001-7213 (printed)
  • ISSN 1801-7576 (electronic)

Current issue

Archive