Acta Vet. Brno 2013, 82: 25-30
https://doi.org/10.2754/avb201382010025
The use of image analysis as a new approach to assess behaviour classification in a pig barn
References
1. DM, Corke M J 2002: Effects of disease on farm animal welfare. Acta Vet Brno 71: 133-136
<https://doi.org/10.2754/avb200271010133>
2. ED, Spoolder HAM, Hulsegge I, Hopster H 2003: Lying characteristics as determinants for space requirements in pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 80: 19-30
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00154-5>
3. D 2003: Assessing animal welfare at the farm and group level: the interplay of science and values. Anim Welfare 12: 433-443
4. PB 2002. Welfare of animal production in intensive and organic systems with special reference to Danish organic pig production. Meat Sci 62: 353-358
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00123-7>
5. CAP, Bruce JM, Fowler VR 1995: A comparison of productivity and welfare of growing pigs in four intensive systems. Livest Prod Sci 43: 265-274
<https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(95)00050-U>
6. Martin P, Bateson P 1986: Measuring behaviour. An introductory guide. Ed. Cambridge University Press.
7. NE, Beattie VE 1999: Influence of environmental enrichment on aggressive behaviour and dominance relationships in growing pigs. Anim Welfare 8: 269-279
8. J 2003: Changing concepts of farm animal welfare: bridging the gap between applied and basic research. Appl Anim Behav Sci 81: 199-214
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00281-2>
9. E, Chloupek P, Steinhauser L, Havlíček J, Večerek V 2010: Influence of housing system and number of transported animals on transport-induced mortality in slaughter pigs. Acta Vet Brno 79: 79-84
<https://doi.org/10.2754/avb201079S9S079>

