Acta Vet. Brno 2013, 82: 25-30

The use of image analysis as a new approach to assess behaviour classification in a pig barn

Annamaria Costa1, Gunel Ismayilova1, Federica Borgonovo1, Toon Leroy2, Daniel Berckmans2, Marcella Guarino1

1University of Milan, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, Milan, Italy
2Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, M3-BIORES: Measure, Model & Manage Bioresponses, Leuven, Belgium


1. Broom DM, Corke M J 2002: Effects of disease on farm animal welfare. Acta Vet Brno 71: 133-136 <>
2. Ekkel ED, Spoolder HAM, Hulsegge I, Hopster H 2003: Lying characteristics as determinants for space requirements in pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 80: 19-30 <>
3. Fraser D 2003: Assessing animal welfare at the farm and group level: the interplay of science and values. Anim Welfare 12: 433-443
4. Gade PB 2002. Welfare of animal production in intensive and organic systems with special reference to Danish organic pig production. Meat Sci 62: 353-358 <>
5. Lyons CAP, Bruce JM, Fowler VR 1995: A comparison of productivity and welfare of growing pigs in four intensive systems. Livest Prod Sci 43: 265-274 <>
6. Martin P, Bateson P 1986: Measuring behaviour. An introductory guide. Ed. Cambridge University Press.
7. O’Connell NE, Beattie VE 1999: Influence of environmental enrichment on aggressive behaviour and dominance relationships in growing pigs. Anim Welfare 8: 269-279
8. Rushen J 2003: Changing concepts of farm animal welfare: bridging the gap between applied and basic research. Appl Anim Behav Sci 81: 199-214 <>
9. Voslářová E, Chloupek P, Steinhauser L, Havlíček J, Večerek V 2010: Influence of housing system and number of transported animals on transport-induced mortality in slaughter pigs. Acta Vet Brno 79: 79-84 <>
front cover
  • ISSN 0001-7213 (printed)
  • ISSN 1801-7576 (electronic)

Current issue