Acta Vet. Brno 2013, 82: 323-329

https://doi.org/10.2754/avb201382030323

The patterns of myoelectrical activity and reaction for teat stimulation recorded in highly productive dairy cows’ udders

Albert Czerski1, Milan Vasiľ2, Juraj Elečko2, Zuzana Farkašová2, František Zigo2, Wojciech Zawadzki1, Przemysław Dudko3, Jan Gnus4, Maciej Janeczek1, Aleksander Chószcz1

1University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Department of Animal Physiology and Biostructure, Institute of Animal Physiology, Wroclaw, Poland
2University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Animal Breeding, Institute of Animal Breeding, Slovak Republic
3Poznań University of Life Sciences, Department of Veterinary, Poland
4Provincial Specialized Hospital, General and Vascular Surgery Ward, Research and Development Center in Wroclaw, Poland

References

1. Adams PR, Constanti A, Brown DA, Clark RB 1982: Intracellular Ca2+ ativates a fast voltage-sensitive K+ current in vertebrate sympathetic neurones. Nature 296: 746-749 <https://doi.org/10.1038/296746a0>
2. Czerski A, Gnus J, Hauzer W, Ratajczak K, Zawadzki W, Witkiewicz W, Ferenc S, Rusiecka A, Janeczek M 2012: Myoelectric activity of the muscular layer of the abdominal aorta in pigs in vivo. Acta Vet Brno 81: 281-286 <https://doi.org/10.2754/avb201281030281>
3. Czerski A, Zawadzki W, Zawadzki M, Czerska Z 2005: Influence of dopamine on rat uterine motylicy in vitro. Acta Vet Brno 74: 9-15 <https://doi.org/10.2754/avb200574010009>
4. Enomoto K, Cossu MF, Edwards C, Oka T 1986: Induction of distinct types of spontaneous electrical activities in mammary epithelial cells by epidermal growth factor and insulin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 4754-4758 <https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.83.13.4754>
5. Galantsev VP, Guliaeva EP, Kuzmin DA, Balakina GB, Popov SM, Uzbekov VV, Shereshkov VI. 1994: Bioelectrical reactions on the surface of the mamma in the goat. Fyziol Zh Im I M Sechenova 80: 132-137
6. Karpov A, Trokhanova O, Cherepenin V, Korjenevsky A 1997: Electrical impedance anatomy of the mammary gland. Bull Russ Acad Med Sci 4: 52-56
7. Loewenstein WR, Penn RD 1967: Intercellular communication and tissue growt: II. tissue regeneration. J Cell Biol 33: 235-242 <https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.33.2.235>
8. Peracchia C, Dulhunty AF 1976: Low resistance junctions in crayfish. Structural changes with functional uncoupling. J Cell Biol 70: 419-439 <https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.70.2.419>
9. Pitelka DR, Hamamoto ST, Duafala JG, Nemanic MK 1973: Cell contacts in the mouse mammary gland: I. normal gland in postnatal development and the secretory cycle. J Cell Biol 56: 797-818 <https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.56.3.797>
10. Shen SS, Hamamoto S T, Pitelka D R 1976: Electrophysiological study of coupling between cultured cells of the mouse mammary gland in five distinct physiological states. J Membr Biol 29: 373-382 <https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01868971>
11. Williams JA 1981: Electrical correlates of secretion in endocrine and exocrine cells. Fed Proc 40: 128-134
front cover
  • ISSN 0001-7213 (printed)
  • ISSN 1801-7576 (electronic)

Current issue

Archive