Acta Vet. Brno 2014, 83: 313-319
https://doi.org/10.2754/avb201483040313
Modified hypoosmotic swelling test for the assessment of boar and bull sperm sensitivity to cryopreservation
References
1. RP 1989: Can the fertility potential of a seminal sample be predicted accurately? J Androl 10: 89-98
<https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.1989.tb00066.x>
2. I, Sancho S, Briz M, Pinart E, Bussalleu E, Yeste M, Bonet S 2010: Fertility after post-cervical artificial insemination with cryopreserved sperm from boar ejaculates of good and poor freezability. Anim Reprod Sci 118: 69-76
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.06.003>
3. PJ, Tredway DR, Corselli J, Pang SC, Su BC 1991: Combined supravital staining and hypoosmotic swelling test. Hum Reprod 6: 1115-1118
<https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137495>
4. JR, Zavos PM 1994: The hypoosmotic swelling test: its employment as an assay to evaluate the functional integrity of the frozen-thawed bovine sperm membrane. Theriogenology 42: 351-360
<https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(94)90280-1>
5. BE 2005: Theoretical aspects of canine semen cryopreservation. Theriogenology 64: 692-697
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.05.019>
6. Hammerstedt RH 1979: Characterization of sperm surface using physical techniques. In: Fawcett DW and Bedford JM (Eds). The spermatozoon: Maturation, Motility, Surface Properties and Comparative Aspects. Urban and Schwarzenberg, Baltimore, USA, pp. 205-216
7. WV, Medrano A, Thurston LM, Watson PF 2005: The significance of cooling rates and animal variability for boar sperm cryopreservation: insights from the cryomicroscope. Theriogenology 63: 370-382
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.018>
8. RS, Van der Ven HH, Perez-Pelaez M, Crabo BG, Zaneveld LJD 1984: Development of an assay the functional integrity of the human sperm membrane and its relationship to other semen characteristics. J Reprod Fert 70: 219-228
<https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0700219>
9. TF, Menkveld R, Stander FSH, Lombard CJ, Van der Merwe JP, Van Zyl JA, Smith K 1986: Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 46: 1118-1123
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)49891-2>
10. JE, Lynch DV 1992: Lipid composition and thermotropic phase behavior of boar, bull, stallion, and rooster sperm membranes. Cryobiology 29: 255-266
<https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2240(92)90024-V>
11. FJ, Saravia F, Johannisson A, Walgren M, Rodríguez-Martínez H 2005: A new and simple method to evaluate early membrane changes in frozen-thawed boar spermatozoa. Int J Androl 28: 107-114
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00512.x>
12. FJ, Saravia F, Johannisson A, Wallgren M, Rodríguez-Martínez H 2007: Detection of early changes in sperm membrane integrity pre-freezing can estimate post-thaw quality of boar spermatozoa. Anim Reprod Sci 97: 74-83
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.12.014>
13. B, Lorenzo JL, Yenes P, Trejo A, Garcia-Casado P 2001: A short hypoosmotic swelling test for the prediction of boar sperm fertility. Theriogenology 56: 387-98
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00571-4>
14. J, Hernández M, Carvajal G, Vázquez JM, Martinez EA 2006: Factors influencing boar sperm cryosurvival. J Anima Sci 84: 2692-2699
<https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-094>
15. H 2003: Laboratory semen assessment and prediction of fertility: still utopia? Reprod Domest Anim 38: 312-318
<https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0531.2003.00436.x>
16. A, Penzo N, Vincenti L, Mantovani R 1999: Hypoosmotic swelling (HOS) as a screening assay for testing in vitro fertility of bovine spermatozoa. Theriogenology 53: 1415-1420
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00284-3>
17. B, Janny L, Boucher D, Grizard G 2004: Annexin V binding to plasma membrane predicts the quality of human cryopreserved spermatozoa. Int J Androl 27: 108-114
<https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2605.2003.00457.x>
18. CM, Ritta MN 2004: Prognostic value of spermatological parameters as predictors of in vitro fertility of frozen-thawed bull semen. Theriogenology 62: 1245-1252
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.01.012>
19. LM, Watson PF, Holt WV 1999: Sources of variation in boar spermatozoa fertility following cryopreservation. Cryobiology 39: 355
20. JM, Martinez EA, Martinez P, Garcia-Artiga C, Roca J 1997: Hypoosmotic swelling of boar spermatozoa compared to other methods for analysing the sperm membrane. Theriogenology 4: 913-922
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(97)00046-0>
21. Z, Matouskova O, Svecova D, Zajicova A 2001: The use of the computer technology for the evaluation of the strict morphological sperm analysis. Vet Med-Czech 46: 35-40
<https://doi.org/10.17221/7849-VETMED>
22. Z, Přinosilová P, Zajícová A, Kunetková M, Hlavicová J 2010: Evaluation of sperm membrane resistance in boars by modification of HOS test (in Czech).Veterinářství 60: 695-697
23. P, Richter L, Treu H 1975: Deep freezing of boar sperma. Laboratory and insemination results using the Hülsenberger paillet method (in German). Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr 82: 261-267
24. World Health Organization 2010: WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen. 5th ed. WHO Press, Geneva, Switzerland, 271 p.s
