Acta Vet. Brno 2015, 84: 125-131

https://doi.org/10.2754/avb201584020125

Influence of selected factors on bovine spermatozoa cold shock resistance

Luděk Stádník1, Radko Rajmon2, Jan Beran1, Ondřej Šimoník2, Martina Doležalová1, Jiří Šichtař2, Roman Stupka1, Petra Folková2

1Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Agrobiology, Department of Animal Husbandry, Prague, Czech Republic
2Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Agrobiology, Department of Veterinary Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic

Received October 22, 2014
Accepted February 25, 2015

References

1. Amirat L, Tainturier D, Jeanneau L, Thorin C, Gerard O, Courtens JL, Anton M 2004: Bull semen in vitro fertility after cryopreservation using egg yolk LDL: a comparison with Optidyl (R), a commercial egg yolk extender. Theriogenology 61: 895-907 <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00259-0>
2. Balić IM, Milinković-Tur S, Samardžija M, Vince S 2012: Effect of age and environmental factors on semen quality, glutathione peroxidase activity and oxidative parameters in simmental bulls. Theriogenology 78: 423-431 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.02.022>
3. Benson RW, Pickett BW, Komarek RJ, Lucas JJ 1967: Effect of incubation and cold shock on motility of boar spermatozoa and their relationship to lipid content. J Anim Sci 26: 1078-1081 <https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1967.2651078x>
4. Beran J, Stádník L, Bezdíček J, Louda F, Čítek J, Ducháček J 2012: Effect of sire and extender on sperm motility and share of live or dead sperm in bulls’ fresh ejaculate and in Al doses after thawing. Arch Tierz-Arch Anim Breed 55: 207-218 <https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-55-207-2012>
5. Beran J, Stádník L, Ducháček J, Okrouhlá M, Doležalová M, Kadlecová V, Ptáček M 2013a: Relationships among the cervical mucus urea and acetone, accuracy of insemination timing, and sperm survival in Holstein cows. Anim Reprod Sci 142: 28-34 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2013.09.005>
6. Beran J, Šimoník O, Stádník L, Rajmon R, Ducháček J, Krejcárková A, Doležalová M, Šichtař J 2013b: Effect of bull, diluter and LDL-cholesterol concentration on spermatozoa resistance against cold shock. Acta Univ Agric Silvic Mendel Brun 61: 1575-1581 <https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201361061575>
7. Bergeron A, Crete MH, Brindle Y, Manjunath P 2004: Low-density lipoprotein fraction from hen’s egg yolk decreases the binding of the major proteins of bovine seminal plasma to sperm and prevents lipid efflux from the sperm membrane. Biol Reprod 70: 708-717 <https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.022996>
8. Bergeron A, Manjunath P 2006: New insights towards understanding the mechanisms of sperm protection by egg yolk and milk. Mol Reprod Dev 73: 1338-1344 <https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20565>
9. Bousseau S, Brillard JP, Marquant-Le Guienne B, Guerin B, Camus A, Lechat M 1998: Comparison of bacteriological qualities of various egg yolk sources and the in vitro and in vivo fertilizing potential of bovine semen frozen in egg yolk or lecithin based diluents. Theriogenology 50: 699-706 <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00175-7>
10. Cao HL, Sun XZ, Li QW, Zhou SX, Nan XB, Hu JH, Wang LQ, He YM 2013: Testing Rhodiola sachalinensis saccharide as cryoprotectant for bovine spermatozoa. J Dairy Sci 96: 6965-6972 <https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-6623>
11. Crespilho AM, Sá Filho MF, Dell’Aqua JA Jr, Nichi M, Monteiro GA, Avanzi BR, Martins A, Papa FO 2012: Comparison of in vitro and in vivo fertilizing potential of bovine semen frozen in egg yolk or new lecithin based extenders. Livest Sci 149: 1-6 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.05.011>
12. Hanuš O, Frelich J, Tomáška M, Vyletělová M, Genčurová V, Kučera J, Třináctý J 2010: The analysis of relationships between chemical composition, physical, technological and health indicators and freezing point in raw cow milk. Czech J Anim Sci 55: 11-29 <https://doi.org/10.17221/1708-CJAS>
13. Härtlová H, Rajmon R, Krontorádová I, Mamica J, Zita L, Klabanová P, Černocký A 2013: Semen quality, lipid peroxidation, and seminal plasma antioxidant status in horses with different intensities of physical exercise. Acta Vet Brno 82: 31-35 <https://doi.org/10.2754/avb201382010031>
14. Hu JH, Li QW, Zan LS, Jiang ZL, An JH, Wang LQ, Jia YH 2010: The cryoprotective effect of low-density lipoproteins in extenders on bull spermatozoa following freezing-thawing. Anim Reprod Sci 117: 11-17 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.04.001>
15. Karoui S, Díaz C, Serrano M, Cue R, Celorrio I, Carabaño MJ 2011: Time trends, environmental factors and genetic basis of semen traits collected in Holstein bulls under commercial conditions. Anim Reprod Sci 124: 28-38 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2011.02.008>
16. Manjunath P, Nauc V, Bergeron A, Ménard M 2002: Major proteins of bovine seminal plasma bind to the low-density lipoprotein fraction of hen’s egg yolk. Biol Reprod 67: 1250-1258 <https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod67.4.1250>
17. Maurya VP, Tuli RK 2003: Post-thaw thermal resistance test on motility and acrosomal integrity of filtered and non-filtered frozen semen of Murrah buffalo bulls. Asian Aust J Anim Sci 16: 1424-1428 <https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2003.1424>
18. Medeiros CMO, Forell F, Oliveira ATD, Rodrigues JL 2002: Current status of sperm cryopreservation: why isn’t it better? Theriogenology 57: 327-344 <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00674-4>
19. Moussa M, Martinet V, Trimeche A, Tainturier D, Anton M 2002: Low density lipoproteins extracted from hen egg yolk by an easy method: cryoprotective effect on frozen-thawed bull semen. Theriogenology 57: 1695-1706 <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)00682-9>
20. Pace MM, Graham EF 1974: Components in egg-yolk which protect bovine spermatozoa during freezing. J Anim Sci 39: 1144-1149 <https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1974.3961144x>
21. Přinosilová P, Kopecká V, Hlavicová J, Kunetková M 2014: Modified hypoosmotic swelling test for the assessment of boar and bull sperm sensitivity to cryopreservation. Acta Vet Brno 83: 313-319 <https://doi.org/10.2754/avb201483040313>
22. Siddique M, Ali R, Raza A 2006: Effect of buffers on freezing of buffalo bull semen. J Agri Soc Sci 2: 117-119
23. Stradaioli G, Noro T, Sylla L, Monaci M 2007: Decrease in glutathione (GSH) content in bovine sperm after cryopreservation: Comparison between two extenders. Theriogenology 67: 1249-1255 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.01.009>
24. Špaleková E, Makarevich AV, Kubovičová E, Ostró A, Chrenek P 2014: Effect of caffeine on functions of cooling-stored ram sperm in vitro. Acta Vet Brno 83: 19-25 <https://doi.org/10.2754/avb201483010019>
25. Thara KM, Nair SP 2007: Sire effect on in vitro fertilizability of matured cattle oocytes. Indian J Biotechnol 6: 421-422
26. Vera-Munoz O, Amirat-Briand L, Bencharif D, Anton M, Desherces S, Shmitt E, Thorin C, Tainturier D 2011: Effect of low-density lipoproteins, spermatozoa concentration and glycerol on functional and motility parameters of bull spermatozoa during storage at 4 degrees C. Asian J Androl 13: 281-286 <https://doi.org/10.1038/aja.2010.84>
27. Vishwanath R, Shannon P 2000: Storage of bovine semen in liquid and frozen state. Anim Reprod Sci 62: 23-53 <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00153-6>
28. Walsh SW, Williams EJ, Evans ACO 2011: A review of the causes of poor fertility in high milk producing dairy cows. Anim Reprod Sci 123: 127-138 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.12.001>
29. Watson PF 2000: The causes of reduced fertility with cryopreserved semen. Anim Reprod Sci 60: 481-492 <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00099-3>
front cover
  • ISSN 0001-7213 (printed)
  • ISSN 1801-7576 (electronic)

Current issue

Archive