Acta Vet. Brno 2016, 85: 23-31
https://doi.org/10.2754/avb201685010023
A comparative study of boar semen extenders with different proposed preservation times and their effect on semen quality and fertility
References
1. 2005: Increasing storage time of extended boar semen reduces sperm DNA integrity. Theriogenology 63: 2006-2019
< GB, Ersbøll AK, Greve T, Christensen P https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.006>
2. 2006: Effect of storage in short- and long-term commercial semen extenders on the motility, plasma membrane and chromatin integrity of boar spermatozoa. Int J Androl 29: 543-552
< M, Ballester J, Saravia F, Caballero I, Johannisson A, Wallgren M, Andersson M, Rodriguez-Martinez H https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2006.00694.x>
3. 2007: Characteristics of sperm motility in boar semen diluted in different extenders and stored for seven days at 18 °C. Reprod Biology 7: 221-231
MJ, Harper AF, Day JL
4. 2008: Identifying useable semen. Theriogenology 70: 1324-1336
< GR, Dyck MK, Ruiz-Sanchez A, Novac S, Dixon WT https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.07.015>
5. 2004: The use of comet assay to assess DNA integrity of boar spermatozoa following liquid preservation at 5 °C and 16 °C. Folia Histochem Cyto 42: 49-55
L, Strzezek J
6. 2010: Effects of long-term liquid commercial semen extender and storage time on the membrane quality of boar semen. Czech J Anim Sci 55: 160-166
< S, Čeřovský J, Lustyková A, Rozkot M https://doi.org/10.17221/62/2009-CJAS>
7. 2003: Review: Semen extenders used in the artificial insemination of swine. Span J Agric Res 1: 17-27
< J https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2003012-17>
8. 2004: The predictive value of porcine seminal parameters on fertility outcome under commercial conditions. Reprod Domest Anim 39: 303-308
< J, Sellés E, Marco MA https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2004.00513.x>
9. 2007: Fertility results of artificial inseminations performed with liquid boar semen stored in X-CellTM vs BTS extender. Reprod Domest Anim 42: 94-99
< T, Gaustad AH, Reksen O, Grοhn YT, Hofmo PO https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00738.x>
10. 2010: Comparative study on six different long term commercial extenders for fresh boar semen. Thai J Vet Med 40: 257-263
K, Srisowanna T, Wichaidit U, Chanapiwat P, Manee-in S
11. 2011: The effect of using long term and short term extenders during cooling process on the quality of frozen boar semen. Thai J Vet Med 41: 283-288
K, Chanapai P, Junchiyaphoom P, Chanapiwat P
12. 2002: Influence of boar and semen parameters on motility and acrosome integrity in liquid boar semen stored for five days. Acta Vet Scand 43: 49-55
< E, Paulenz H, Sehested E, Grevle IS https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-43-49>
13. 1999: The fecundity of porcine semen stored for 2 to 6 days in Androhep and X-cell extenders. Theriogenology 52: 365-376
< GE, Althouse GC https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00135-1>
14. 2005: Uterine activity, sperm transport, and the role of boar stimuli around insemination in sows. Theriogenology 63: 500-513
< P, Soede NM, Kemp B https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.027>
15. Maes D, Lopez RA, Rijsselaere T, Vyt P, Van Soom A 2011: Artificial insemination in pigs. In: Manafi M (Ed.): Artificial Insemination in Farm Animals. In Tech, Rijeka, pp. 79-94
16. 2006: Sperm DNA fragmentation in boars is delayed or abolished by using sperm extenders. Theriogenology 66: 2137-2143
< Β, Enciso Garcıa-Casado P, Sala R, Gosalvez J https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.01.066>
17. 2005: Boar spermatozoa in the oviduct. Theriogenology 63: 514-535
< H, Saravia F, Wallgrena M, Tienthai P, Johannisson A, Vázquez JM, Martínez E, Roca J, Sanze L, Calvete JJ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.028>
18. 2006: Sperm transport in the female reproductive tract. Hum Reprod Update 12: 23-37
< SS, Pacey AA https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmi047>
19. 1999: The importance of porcine sperm parameters on fertility in vivo. Theriogenology 52: 447-459
< S, Laforest JP, Cormier N, Bailey JL https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00142-9>
20. 1984: A test for the practical evaluation of male fertility by acridine orange (AO) fluorescence. Fertil Steril 42: 87-91
< RI, Mitchell JC, Norman A, Marik JJ, Friedman S https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)47963-X>
21. 2010: Relationship between sperm quality traits and field-fertility of porcine semen. J Vet Sci 11: 151-154
< IA, Lymberopoulos AG, Khalifa TA https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2010.11.2.151>
22. 2004: Comparative study on five different commercial extenders for boar semen. Reprod Domest Anim 39: 8-12
< P, Maes D, Dejonckheere E, Castryck F, Van Soom A https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0531.2003.00468.x>
23. 2008: Detailed motility evaluation of boar semen and its predictive value for reproductive performance in sows. Vlaams Diergen Tijds 77: 291-298
P, Maes D, Quinten C, Rijsselaere T, Deley W, Aarts M, de Kruif A, Van Soom A
24. 2003: Effect of boar exposure at time of insemination on factors influencing fertility in gilts. J Anim Sci 81: 9-15
< KL, Miller GM, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Knox RV https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.8119>
25. World Health Organization WHO 2010: Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Sperm and Semen-Cervical Mucus Interaction. WHO Press, Geneva