Acta Vet. Brno 2017, 86: 123-131
https://doi.org/10.2754/avb201786020123
Insight into the pathomorphology of the distal border of the equine navicular bone
References
1. A 1993: Mineral and mechanics of bone fragility fractures. Acta Orthop 64: 227-232
<https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679308994578>
2. VA, Sample SJ, Livesey MA, Scollay MC, Radtke CL, Frank JD, Kalscheur VL, Muir P 2007: Morphologic changes associated with functional adaptation of the navicular bone of horses. J Anat 211: 662-672
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2007.00800.x>
3. M, Blunden T, Dyson S 2012: Can distal border fragments of the navicular bone be a primary cause of lameness? Equine Vet Educ 25: 347-351
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3292.2012.00403.x>
4. M, Dyson S 2010: Comparison between radiological and magnetic resonance imaging lesions in the distal border of the navicular bone with particular reference to distal border fragments and osseous cyst-like lesions. Equine Vet J 42: 707-712
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00117.x>
5. M, Dyson S 2011: High-field magnetic resonance imaging investigation of distal border fragments of the navicular bone in horses with foot pain. Equine Vet J 43: 302-308
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00159.x>
6. M, Dyson S 2012: Distal border fragments and shape of the navicular bone: radiological evaluation in lame horses and horses free from lameness. Equine Vet J 44: 325-31
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00429.x>
7. A, Dyson S, Murray R, Schramme M 2006: Histopathology in horses with chronic palmar foot pain and age-matched controls. Part 1: Navicular bone and related structures. Equine Vet J 38: 15-22
<https://doi.org/10.2746/042516406775374298>
8. H, van der Meij GJ, Dik KJ 1986: Heredity of the navicular disease. Vet Q 8: 68-72
<https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.1986.9694020>
9. RM, Rockershouser SJ, Linder K, Kelly BV, Ioana MS, Caron JP 1994: A silver-impregnation and immunocytochemical study of innervation of the distal sesamoid bone and its suspensory ligaments in the horse. Equine Vet J 26: 212-219
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1994.tb04372.x>
10. S, Bergman EHJ, van der Veen H, Vanderperren K, Raes EV, Saunders JH 2011: Computed tomographic morphology of the synovial invaginations of the distal sesamoid bone of the horse. Anat Histol Embryol 40: 55-60
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0264.2010.01038.x>
11. S, Bergman HJ, van der Veen H, Duchateau L, Raes EV, Vanderperren K, Saunders JH 2011: Morphology of distal border synovial invaginations of the equine distal sesamoid bone: comparison between computed tomography and a hoof-specific radiographic projection. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 25: 453-459
<https://doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-11-10-0149>
12. CM, Hickman J 1977: The arterial supply of the navicular bone and its variations in navicular disease. Equine Vet J 9: 150-154
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1977.tb04009.x>
13. Denoix, J-M 1999: Functional anatomy of the equine interphalangeal joints. Proc AAEP 45
14. U, Distl O 2007: Review of genetic aspects of radiological alterations in the navicular bone of the horse. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr 114: 404-411
15. S 2008: Radiological interpretation of the navicular bone. Equine Vet J 20: 268–280
<https://doi.org/10.2746/095777308X294306>
16. S, Murray R, Blunden T, Schramme M 2006: Current concepts of navicular disease. Equine Vet J 18: 45-56
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3292.2006.tb00414.x>
17. M, Charuta A 2012: The analysis of densitometric and geometric parameters of bilateral proximal phalanges in horses with the use of peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Acta Vet Scand 54: 41-51
<https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-54-41>
18. M, Komosa M 2013: Variability of the proximal phalanx in warmblood and coldblood horses – morphological and structural analyses. Belg J Zool 143: 119-130
19. Ecrement O 2011: Clinical and sport impact of distal fragments of distal sesamoid bone of sport horses. PhD Thesis University of Alfort pp 1-67
20. Finne R 2014: Genetics and markers of navicular disease in warmblood sport horses. Available at: http://www.huveta.hu/handle/10832/1283
21. EC, Rogers CW, Double M, Jopson NB 2005: Musculoskeletal responses of 2-year old Thoroughbred horses to early training. Bone parameters in the third metacarpal and third metatarsal bones. N Z Vet J 53: 101-112
<https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2005.36487>
22. A, Detilleux J, Jolly S, Reginster J-Y, Collin B, Dessy-Doizé C 1999: Morphometric Study of the Equine Navicular Bone: Age-Related Changes and Influence of Exercise. Vet Res Commun 23: 15-40
<https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006102921304>
23. A, Jolly S, Detilleux J, Dessy-Doize C, Collin B, Reginster JY 1998: Morphometric study of the navicular bone: variations with breeds and types of horse and influence of exercise. J Anat 193: 535-549
<https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-7580.1998.19340535.x>
24. J 1989: Navicular disease--what are we talking about? Equine Vet J 21: 395-398
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1989.tb02182.x>
25. B, Ueltschi G 1992: Radiographic appearance of the navicular bone in sound horses. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 33: 9-17
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.1992.tb01949.x>
26. M, Łazowski S, Włodarek J, Kowalczyk K, Charuta A, Zdun M 2014: Gross and histological evaluation of early lesions of navicular bone and deep digital flexor tendon in horses. Bull Vet Instit in Pulawy 58: 87-91
<https://doi.org/10.2478/bvip-2014-0014>
27. M, Purzyc H, Frąckowiak H 2013a: Changes in navicular bone (os sesamoideum distale) shape in horses as a result of pathological alterations. Folia Biol (Krakow) 61: 1-10
<https://doi.org/10.3409/fb61_1-2.01>
28. M, Purzyc H, Wojnar M, Frąckowiak H, Kobryńczuk F 2013b: Navicular syndrome in sport horses as a result of the disorder of biological bone tissue turnover rhythm: A review. Biol Rhythm Res 44: 339-351
<https://doi.org/10.1080/09291016.2012.681850>
29. Lowe JE 1976: Sex, breed, and age incidence of navicular disease. Proc AAEP 37
30. MacGregor CM 1984: Studies on the pathology and treatment of equine navicular disease. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh
31. CM 1986: Radiographic assessment of navicular bones, based on changes in the distal nutrient foramina. Equine Vet J 18: 203-206
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1986.tb03599.x>
32. J, Videau M 2017: Distal border synovial invaginations of the equine distal sesamoid bone communicate with the distal interphalangeal joint. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2: 107-110
<https://doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-16-08-0120>
33. L, Lund C, Melsen F 1982: Histological study of navicular bone disease. Equine Vet J 14: 199-202
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1982.tb02391.x>
34. PW, Smith MF 1988: The nature of enlarged ‘vascular channels’ in the navicular bone of the horse. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 29: 60-64
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.1988.tb01749.x>
35. AB, Nemeth F, Dik KJ, Goedegebuure SA 1989a: The arterial supply of the navicular bone in the normal horse. Equine Vet J 21: 399-404
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1989.tb02184.x>
36. AB, Németh F, Dik KJ, Goedegebuure SA 1989b: Development of the navicular bone in foetal and young horses, including the arterial supply. Equine Vet J 21: 405-412
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1989.tb02185.x>
37. AB, Németh F, Dik KJ, Goedegebuure SA 1989c: The arterial supply of the navicular bone in adult horses with navicular disease. Equine Vet J 21: 418-424
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1989.tb02187.x>
38. EA, Kawcak CE, McIlwraith CW, Norrdin RW 2000: Remodeling of the navicular bone in response to exercise - a controlled study. AAEP Proc 46: 46-50
39. KF, Hamann H, Distl O 2004: Variance component estimation on the frequency of pathologic changes in the navicular bones of Hanoverian Warmblood horses. J Anim Breeding Gent 121: 289-301
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0388.2004.00470.x>
40. RW, Hanson RR 2010: Navicular syndrome in equine patients anatomy, causes, and diagnosis. Compend Contin Educ Vet 32: 1-13
41. Wilson A, Weller R 2011: Diagnosis and Management of Lameness in the Horse, chapter 26: The Biomechanics of the Equine Limb and Its Effect on Lameness. Elsevier Saunders 270-281
42. AM, McGuigan MP, Fouracre L, MacMahon L 2001: The force and contact stress on the navicular bone during trot locomotion in sound horses and horses with navicular disease. Equine Vet J 33: 159-165
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2001.tb00594.x>
43. IM 1993: A study of 118 cases of navicular disease: radiological features. Equine Vet J 25: 493-500
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1993.tb03000.x>
44. IM, Kidd L, Thorp BH 1998: Gross, histological and histomorphometric features of the navicular bone and related structures in the horse. Equine Vet J 30: 220-34
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1998.tb04491.x>
45. EH, Judy CE, Saveraid TC, McGowan CP, Caldwell FJ 2014: Distal border fragments of the equine navicular bone: association between magnetic resonance imaging characteristics and clinical lameness. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 55: 35-44
<https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.12082>
46. D, Polidori C, Giancamillo di M, Zani DD 2016: Correlation of radiographic measurements of structures of the equine foot with lesions detected on magnetic resonance imaging. Equine Vet J 48: 165-171
<https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12411>
