Acta Vet. Brno 2018, 87: 347-350
https://doi.org/10.2754/avb201887040347
Partial resection of the urinary bladder in swine and sheep and replacement of the resected segment by biologically inert patches
References
1. A 1998: Tissue engineering in urologic surgery. Urol Clin N Am 25: 39-50
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70431-6>
2. H, Fahmy A 2013: Single- vs. multi-stage repair of proximal hypospadias: The dilemma continues. Arab J Urol 11: 174-181
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2013.03.009>
3. I, Bashir A, Elenkov CHG, Panchev P 2006: Dorsal onlay augmentation urethroplasty with small intestinal submucosa: Modified Barbagli technique for strictures of the bulbar urethra. Int J Urol 13: 1415-1417
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2006.01587.x>
4. A, El-Hamid MA, Hafez AT 2004: Urethral replacement: a comparison between small intestinal submucosa grafts and spontaneous regeneration. BJU Int 94: 1132-1135
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05115.x>
5. DJ, Shappell SB, Adams MC, Brock JW III, Pope JC IV 2001: Small intestinal submucosa as urethral coverage layer. J Urol 166: 636-639
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66033-8>
6. AM, Payabvash S, Salmasi AH, Sadeghi Z, Elmi A, Vejdani K, Tavangar SM, Tajik P, Mahjoub F 2007: Time-dependent neovasculogenesis and regeneration of different bladder wall components in the bladder acellular matrix graft in rats. J Surg Res 139: 189-202
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2006.11.003>
7. PM, Lingeman JE, Siegel YI, Badylak SF, Demeter RJ 1994: Biocompatibility of small-intestinalsubmucosa in urinary tract as augmentation cystoplasty graft and injectable suspension. J Endourol 8: 125
<https://doi.org/10.1089/end.1994.8.125>
8. BP, Eppley BL, Prevel CD 1995: Experimental assessment of small intestinal submucosa as bladder wall substitute. Urology 46: 396-400
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80227-1>
9. Latimer KS, Mahaffey EA, Prasse KW 2003: Duncan and Prasse’s Veterinary Laboratory Medicine: Clinical Pathology, 4th edn, Wiley-Blacwell. In: The Merck Veterinary Manual 10th edition 2010, USA, pp. 2824-2825
10. A, Patterson JM, Chapple CR 2011: A systematic review of graft augmentation urethroplasty techniques for the treatment of anterior urethral strictures. Eur Urol 59: 797-814
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.02.010>
11. DJ, Cheng EY 2009: Tissue engineering in urology. Can Urol Assoc J 3: 403-408
<https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.1155>
12. ME, Gonzales R, Cabral BH, Bauer SB, Gesrhart JP, Filmer RB 1987: Bladder augmentation problems in neurovesical dysfunction. Dial Pediatr Urol 10: 1
13. PP, Gamba PG, Conconi MT, Midrio P 2000: Experimental defect in rabbit urethra repaired with acellular aortic matrix. Urol Res 28: 46-51
<https://doi.org/10.1007/s002400050009>
14. M, Dahiya R, Carrier S, Tanagho EA 1997: Reproduction of functional smooth muscle tissue and partial bladder replacement. Brit J Urol 79: 505-515
<https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410X.1997.00103.x>
15. N, Li WJ, Tian H 2016: A systematic review of animal and clinical studies on the use of scaffolds for urethral repair. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci 36: 111-117
<https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-016-1551-5>
16. AM, Rosenberg EJ, Hiles MC, Pavalko FM 2004: Improved biocompatibility of small intestinal submucosa (SIS) following conditioning by human endothelia cells. Biomaterials 25: 515-525
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00552-0>
17. H, Shaffer BS, Wadia Y, Gregory KW 2000: Use of reconstructed small intestine submucosa for urinary tract replacement. ASAIO J 46: 268-272
<https://doi.org/10.1097/00002480-200005000-00005>
18. JP 2016: Urinary tract cancers: An overview for general practice. J Family Med Prim Care 5: 533-538
