Acta Vet. Brno 2019, 88: 73-84
https://doi.org/10.2754/avb201988010073
Properties of potentially probiotic Lactobacillus isolates from poultry intestines
References
1. B, Kwon YM 2017: Characterization of the culturable subpopulations of Lactobacillus in the chicken intestinal tract as a resource for probiotic development. Front Microbiol 8: a1389
<https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01389>
2. A, Agazzi A, Invernizzi G, Bontempo V, Savoini G 2015: The beneficial role of probiotics in monogastric animal nutrition and health. J Dairy Vet Anim Res 2: 116-132
3. E, Raoult D 2010: The increase of Lactobacillus species in the gut flora of newborn broiler chicks and ducks is associated with weight gain. PLoS ONE 5: e10463
<https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010463>
4. D, Strakova E, Kmet V 2014: In vitro evaluation of the safety and probiotic properties of lactobacilli isolated from chicken and calves. Anaerobe 29: 118-127
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2013.10.009>
5. MC, Meriluoto J, Salminen S 2007: Measurement of aggregation properties between probiotics and pathogens: in vitro evaluation of different methods. J Microbiol Meth 71: 71-74
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2007.07.005>
6. M, Puchalski A, Urban-Chmiel R, Wernicki A 2016: 16S-ARDRA and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry as tools for identification of Lactobacillus bacteria isolated from poultry. BMC Microbiology 16: 105
<https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-016-0732-5>
7. RM, Frese SA, Lin XB, Fernando SC, Burkey TE, Tasseva G, Peterson DA, Blom J, Wenzel CQ, Szymanski CM, Walter J 2017a: Experimental evaluation of host adaptation of Lactobacillus reuteri to different vertebrate species. Appl Environ Microbiol 83: e00132-17
<https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00132-17>
8. RM, LinXB, Zheng J, Martino, ME, Grenier T, Pérez-Muñoz ME, Leulier F, Gänzle M, Walter J 2017b: Lifestyles in transition: evolution and natural history of the genus Lactobacillus. FEMS Microbiol Rev 41: S27-S48
<https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fux030>
9. M, Šedo O, Kšicová K, Zdráhal Z, Karpíšková R 2012: Identification of lactobacilli isolated from food by genotypic methods and MALDI-TOF MS. Int J Food Microbiol 159: 107-114
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.07.029>
10. C, Laghi L, Parolin C, Giordani B, Compri M, Cevenini R 2017: Novel approaches for the taxonomic and metabolic characterization of lactobacilli: Integration of 16S rRNA gene sequencing with MALDI-TOF MS and 1H-NMR. PLoS ONE 12: e0172483
<https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172483>
11. G 2012: Selection and design of lactic acid bacteria probiotic cultures. Eng Life Sci 12: 391-398
<https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201100118>
12. L, Collado CM, Salminen S 2012: Evaluation of aggregation abilities between commensal fish bacteria and pathogens. Aquaculture 356: 412-414
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.04.015>
13. PK, Trivedi D, Thakore K, Chaudhary H, Giri SS, Seshadri S 2013: Isolation and characterization of probiotic properties of Lactobacilli isolated from rat fecal microbiota. Microbiol Immunol 57: 407-416
<https://doi.org/10.1111/1348-0421.12054>
14. M, Binek M 2016: Assessment of potentially probiotic properties of Lactobacillus strains isolated from chickens. Pol J Vet Sci 19: 15-20
<https://doi.org/10.1515/pjvs-2016-0003>
15. J, Juránková J, Doubek J, Příbramská, Frič P, Dítě P Kolář M, Scheer P, Kosáková D 2006: Labelling and content evaluation of commercial veterinary probiotics. Acta Vet Brno 75: 139-144
<https://doi.org/10.2754/avb200675010139>
16. M, Cejkova D, Polansky O, Karasova D, Kubasova T, Cizek A, Rychlik I 2018: Whole genome sequencing and function prediction of 133 gut anaerobes isolated from chicken caecum in pure cultures. BMC Genomics 19: 561
<https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4959-4>
17. CG, Beski SSM, Choct M, Iji PA 2015: Novel probiotics: Their effects on growth performance, gut development, microbial community and activity of broiler chickens. Anim Nutr 1: 184-191
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2015.07.003>
18. MSR, Hayatb HF, Sarwarb S, Mehwishc HM, Ahmada F, Hussainc N, Shahb SZH, Khurshidc M, Siddiqu M, Shi J 2018: Isolation and evaluation of probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria isolated from poultry intestine. Microbiol 87: 116-126
<https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026261718010150>
19. M 1984: Bacterial adherence to hydrocarbons: a useful technique for studying cell surface hydrophobicity. FEMS Microbiol Lett 22: 289-295
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1984.tb00743.x>
20. P, Faseleh Jahromi M, Liang JB, Ramasamy K, Sieo CC, Ho YW 2017: Effects of a Lactobacillus salivarius mixture on performance, intestinal health and serum lipids of broiler chickens. PLoS ONE 12: e0175959
<https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175959>
21. DP, Moore RJ, Allison GE 2010: Lactobacillus strain ecology and persistence within broiler chickens fed different diets: identification of persistent strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 76: 6494-6503
<https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01137-10>
22. J, Čížek A 2017: The effect of Enterococcus faecium M74 feed additive on the extended-spectrum beta-lactamases/AmpC-positive Escherichia coli faecal counts in pre-weaned dairy calves. Acta Vet Brno 86: 333-338
<https://doi.org/10.2754/avb201786040333>
23. GW 2004: A Special Fondness for Lactobacilli. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 3189-3194
<https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.6.3189-3194.2004>
24. T, Andersson K, Sydow M, Axelsson L, Lingren S, Gullmar B 1987: Surface properties of lactobacilli isolated from the small-intestine of pigs. J Appl Microbiol 62: 513-520
25. L, Fang M, Hu Y, Yang Y, Yang M, Chen Y 2014: Characterization of the most abundant Lactobacillus species in chicken gastrointestinal tract and potential use as probiotics for genetic engineering. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin 46: 612-619
<https://doi.org/10.1093/abbs/gmu037>
