Acta Vet. Brno 2020, 89: 333-340
https://doi.org/10.2754/avb202089040333
Effect of sperm concentration on boar spermatozoa mitochondrial membrane potential and motility in semen stored at 17 °C
References
1. A, Ramalho-Santos J 2010: Assessment of mitochondrial potential: implications for the correct monitoring of human sperm function. Int J Androl 33: 180-186
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2009.00987.x>
2. BA 2008: Oxidative stress, osmotic stress and apoptosis: impacts on sperm function and preservation in the horse. Anim Reprod Sci 107: 257-267
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.04.014>
3. D, Andraszek K, Biesiada-Drzazga B 2015: Evaluation of sperm chromatin structure in the semen of insemination boars. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 59: 271-277
<https://doi.org/10.1515/bvip-2015-0040>
4. M, Andraszek K, Banaszewska D, Walczak-Jędrzejewska R 2019: The effect of the staining technique on morphological and morphometric parameters of boar sperm. PLoS One 14: 1-17
<https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214243>
5. M, Ballester J, Saravia F, Caballero I, Johannisson A, Wallgren M, Andersson M, Rodriguez-Martinez H 2006: Effect of storage in short and long-term commercial semen extenders on the motility, plasma membrane and chromatin integrity of boar spermatozoa. Int J Androl 29: 543-552
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2006.00694.x>
6. E, Risopatrón J, Sánchez R, Isachenko E, Merino O,Valdebenito I 2013: Spermatozoa vitrification of sex-reversed rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): Effect of seminal plasma on physiological parameters. Aquaculture 372-375: 119-126
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.10.019>
7. D, Piasecka M, Udała J, Błaszczyk B, Stankiewicz T, Laszczyńska M 2010: Plasma membrane changes during the liquid storage of boar spermatozoa: a comparison of methods. Acta Vet Hung 58: 105-116
<https://doi.org/10.1556/avet.58.2010.1.11>
8. L, Morrell JM, Pena FJ, Macias-Garcia B 2012: Osmotic shock induces structural damage on equine spermatozoa plasmalemma and mitochondria. Theriogenology 78: 415-422
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.02.021>
9. K, Kondracki S, Wysokińska A, Iwanina M 2018: Dependence of sperm morphology and ejaculate characteristics on sperm concentration in the ejaculates of Hypor boars. J Vet Res 62: 353-357
<https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2018-0050>
10. CG, Liu IKM, Davis RO, Hughes JP, Casey PJ 1996: Quantification of normal head morphometry of stallion spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil 108: 41-46
<https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.1080041>
11. A, Kerziene S, Dauksiene A, Mikniene Z, Zilinskas H, Sutkeviciene N 2020: The effect of royal jelly on boar sperm viability and motility during liquid storage for 96 hours. Acta Vet Brno 89: 47-53
<https://doi.org/10.2754/avb202089010047>
12. S, Wysokińska A, Iwanina M, Banaszewska D, Sitarz D 2011: Effect of sperm concentration in an ejaculate on morphometric traits of spermatozoa in Duroc boars. Pol J Vet Sci 14: 35-40
<https://doi.org/10.2478/v10181-011-0005-z>
13. S, Banaszewska D, Bajena M, Komorowska K, Kowalewski D 2013: Correlation of frequency of spermatozoa morphological alterations with sperm concentration in ejaculates of Polish Landrace boars. Acta Vet Beograd 63: 513-524
<https://doi.org/10.2298/AVB1306513K>
14. D, Kondracki S, Górski K, Bajena M, Wysokińska A 2016: Effect of piggery microclimate on ejaculate performance of artificial insemination boars. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 22: 225-232
15. A, Kadirvel G, Bujarbaruah KM, Bardoloi RK, Das A, Kumar S, Naskar S 2009: Preservation of boar semen at 18°C induces lipid peroxidation and apoptosis like changes in spermatozoa. Anim Reprod Sci 110: 162-171
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.01.006>
16. Rodriguez A, Rijsselaere T, Vyt P, Van Soom A, Maes D 2012: Effect of dilution temperature on boar semen quality. Reprod Dom Anim 47: 63-66
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2011.01938.x>
17. S, Schatten H, Sun Q 2013: Sperm mitochondria in reproduction: good or bad and where do they go? J Genet Genomics 40: 549-556
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2013.08.004>
18. C, Jouy N, Lerroy-Martin B, Defossez A, Formstecher P, Marchetti P 2004: Comparison of four fluorochromes for the detection of the inner mitochondrial membrane potential in human spermatozoa and their correlation with sperm motility. Hum Reprod 19: 2267-2276
<https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh416>
19. D, Barón FJ, Robina A, Brygado MJ, Hurtado de Llera A, García-Marín LJ, Gil MC 2013: Inter-and intra-breed comparative study of sperm motility and viability in Iberian and Duroc boar semen during long-term storage in MR-A and XCell extenders. Anim Reprod Sci 139: 109-114
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2013.04.001>
20. D, Gallo M, Rizzo F, Baldi E, Francavilla S, Lenzi A, Lombardo F, Gandini L 2011: Mitochondrial membrane potential profile and its correlation with increasing sperm motility. Fertil Steril 95: 2315-2319
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.03.059>
21. P, Focarelli R, Stendardi A, Ferramosca A, Zara V 2012: The role of mitochondria in energy production for human sperm motility. Int J Androl 35: 109-124
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2011.01218.x>
22. M, Bortfeldt R, Schäfer J, Jung M, Fuchs-Kittowski F 2018: Effect of vibration emission during shipping of artificial insemination doses on boar semen quality. Anim Reprod Sci 192: 328-334
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2018.03.035>
23. M, Buder S, Rüdiger K, Beyerbach M, Waberski D 2014: Influences on semen traits used for selection of young AI boars. Anim Reprod Sci 148: 164-170
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.06.008>
24. M, Henning H, Rudiger K, Wallner U, Waberski D 2013: Temperature management during semen processing: impact on boar sperm quality under laboratory and field conditions. Theriogenology 80: 990-998
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.07.026>
25. N, Pande M 2016: Mitochondrion: Features, functions and comparative analysis of specific probes in detecting sperm cell damages. Asian Pacific J Reprod 5: 445-452
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjr.2016.10.008>
26. A, Kondracki S 2014: Assessment of changes in sperm cell membrane integrity occurring during the storage of semen from genetically different males using two diagnostic methods. Can J Anim Sci 94: 601-606
<https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas2013-095>
27. A, Kondracki S 2019: Heterosis for morphometric characteristics of sperm cells from Duroc x Pietrain crossbred boars. Anim Reprod Sci 211: 106217
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.106217>
28. A, Kondracki S, Iwanina M 2015: The usefulness of selected physicochemical indices, cell membrane integrity and sperm chromatin structure in assessments of boar semen sensitivity. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 28: 1713-1720
<https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0095>
29. P, Maes D, Sys SU, Rijsselaere T, Van Soom A 2007: Air contact influences the pH of extended porcine semen. Reprod Dom Anim 42: 218-220
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00733.x>
30. L, Fraser L, Kordan W, Wasilewska K 2015: Individual and seasonal variations in the quality of fractionated boar ejaculates. Theriogenology 83: 1287-1303
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.01.015>
31. M 2016: Sperm cryopreservation update: Cryodamage, markers, and factors affecting the sperm freezability in pigs. Theriogenology 85: 47-64
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.09.047>
