Acta Vet. Brno 2021, 90: 287-293

A survey of mercury content in pig tissues carried out in the Czech Republic during years 2015–2019

Martin Svoboda1, Jiří Bureš2, Jiří Drápal3, Kristýna Geboliszová4, Danka Haruštiaková5,6, Leona Nepejchalová2, Marie Skočovská4, Zdeňka Svobodová7

1University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ruminant and Swine Clinic, Brno, Czech Republic
2Institute for State Control of Veterinary Biologicals and Medicines, Brno, Czech Republic
3Central Veterinary Administration of the State Veterinary Administration, Prague, Czech Republic
4University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Large Animal Clinical Laboratory, Brno, Czech Republic
5Masaryk University, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Brno, Czech Republic
6Masaryk University, Faculty of Science, RECETOX, Brno, Czech Republic
7University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, Department of Animal Protection and Welfare and Veterinary Public Health, Brno, Czech Republic

Received November 4, 2020
Accepted August 31, 2021


1. Berlin M, Ullberg S 1963: Accumulation and retention of mercury in the mouse. I. An autoradiographic study after a single intravenous injection of mercuric chloride. Arch Environ Health 6: 589-601 <>
2. Bernhoft RA 2012: Mercury Toxicity and Treatment: A Review of the Literature. J Environ Public Health 2012: 1-10 <>
3. Clarkson TW, Vyas JB, Ballatori N 2007: Mechanisms of mercury disposition in the body. Am J Ind Med 50: 757-764 <>
4. Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/73 of 16 January 2018 amending Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for mercury compounds in or on certain products. OJ L 13, 18.1.2018, pp. 8-20
5. Council Directive 96/23/EC of 29 April 1996 on measures to monitor certain substances and residues thereof in live animals and animal products and repealing Directives 85/358/EEC and 86/469/EEC and Decisions 89/187/EEC and 91/664/EEC, OJ L 125, 23.5.1996, pp. 10-32
6. Curley A, Sedlak VA, Girling EF, Hawk RE, Barthel WF 1971: Organic mercury identified as the cause of poisoning in humans and hogs. Science 172: 65-67 <>
7. Drápal J, Haldová S 2014: Mercury content in the meat and organs of cattle and pigs. Maso International 4: 87-90
8. EFSA 2008: Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Contaminants in the food chain on a request from the European Commission on mercury as undesirable substance in feed. EFSA J 654: 1-76
9. Falandsyz J 1993: Some toxic and essential trace metals in swine from Northern Poland. Sci Total Environ 136: 193-204 <>
10. Gyrd-Hansen N, Helleberg A 1976: Methoxyethyl mercury toxicity in pigs: kidney function and mercury distribution. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 38: 229-240 <>
11. Gyrd-Hansen N 1981: Toxicokinetics of methyl mercury in pigs. Arch Toxicol 48: 173-181 <>
12. Haley BE 2005: Mercury toxicity: genetic susceptibility and synergistic effects. Medical Veritas: J Med Truth 2: 535-542 <>
13. Lohren H, Blagojevic L, Fitkau R, et al. 2015: Toxicity of organic and inorganic mercury species in differentiated human neurons and human astrocytes. J Trace Elem Med Biol 32: 200-208 <>
14. López-Alonso M, Miranda M, Castillo C, Hernández J, García-Vaquero M, Benedito JL 2007: Toxic and essential metals in liver, kidney and muscle of pigs at slaughter in Galicia, north-west Spain. Food Addit Contam 24: 943-954 <>
15. Marshall BL 1989: Mercury residues in the tissues of domestic pigs and feral animals in New Zealand. Surveillance 16: 17-22
16. Martinez-Finley EJ, Aschner M 2014: Recent advances in mercury research. Curr Environ Health Reports 1: 163-171 <>
17. Morel FM, Kraepiel AM, Amyot M 1998: The chemical cycle and bioaccumulation of mercury. Annual Rev Ecol Sys 29: 543-566 <>
18. Nawrocka A, Durkalec M, Szkoda J, Filipek A, Kmiecik M, Żmudzki J, Posyniak A 2020: Total mercury levels in the muscle and liver of livestock and game animals in Poland, 2009–2018. Chemosphere 258: 1-12 <>
19. Norseth T, Clarkson TW 1971: Intestinal transport of 203Hg-labeled methyl mercury chloride. Role of biotransformation in rats. Arch Environ Health 22: 568-577 <>
20. Pirrone N, Costa P, Pacyna JM, Ferrara R 2001: Mercury emissions to the atmosphere from natural and anthropogenic sources in the Mediterranean region. Atmos Environ 35: 2997-3006 <>
21. Saturday A 2018: Mercury and its associated impacts on environment and human health: A review. J Environ Health Sci 4: 37-43
22. Sundseth K, Pacyna JM, Pacyna EG, Pirrone N, Thorne RJ 2017: Global sources and pathways of mercury in the context of human health. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14: 105 <>
23. Taugner R, Winkel K, Iravani J 1966: The localization of mercuric chloride concentration in the rat kidney. Virchows Archiv 340: 369-383 <>
24. Ulrich R, Raszyk J, Nápravník A 2001: Variations in contamination by mercury, cadmium and lead on swine farms in the district of Hodonin in 1994 to 1999. Vet Med 46: 132-139 <>
25. ÚSKVBL 2014: Nastavení rozhodovacího limitu pro obsah rtuti v ledvinách potravinových zvířat (s výjimkou ryb) (in Czech, Setting a decision limit for mercury in the kidneys of food - producing animals (excluding fish). Ústav pro státní kontrolu veterinárních biopreparátů a léčiv (Institute for State Control of Veterinary Biologicals and Medicines). Available from:
front cover
  • ISSN 0001-7213 (printed)
  • ISSN 1801-7576 (electronic)

Current issue

Indexed in DOAJ