Acta Vet. Brno 2021, 90: 407-414
https://doi.org/10.2754/avb202190040407
Comparison of the effect of two anti-adhesion materials on the formation of postoperative adhesions after myomectomy – an experimental study on rabbit does
References
1. HM 2011: Prevention of peritoneal adhesions: a promising role for gene therapy. World J Gastroenterol 17: 5049-5058
<https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i46.5049>
2. RP, Trindade MR, Muller AL, Nunes AG, Da Silva R, Meyer FS, Cerski CT 2010: Experimental model of the formation of pelvic adhesions by videolaparoscopic in female rabbits. Acta Cir Bras 25: 34-36
<https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502010000100009>
3. G, Haas M, Polte S 2018: Effect of 4DryField® PH, a novel adhesion barrier, on recurrence of intestinal adhesions after extensive visceral adhesiolysis. Case Rep Surg 2018: 9628742
4. JS, Lee MS, Kim J, Eom MR, Jeong EJ, Lee M, Park SA, Jeong JH, Kwon SK 2021: Hyaluronic acid coating on hydrophobic tracheal scaffold enhances mesenchymal stem cell adhesion and tracheal regeneration. Tissue Eng Regen Med 18: 225-233
<https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-021-00335-2>
5. F, Ansaloni L, Manfredi R, Campanati L, Poiasina E, Bertoli P, Capponi MG, Sartelli M, Di Saverio S, Cucchi M, Lazzareschi D, Pisano M, Catena F 2013: Peritoneal adhesion index (PAI): proposal of a score for the “ignored iceberg” of medicine and surgery. World J Emerg Surg 8: 6
<https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-8-6>
6. M, Lorenzová J, Urbanová L, Fichtel T, Nečas A 2008: Two techniques of intestinal wall suture in surgical treatment of ileus in dogs and the importance of omentalisation. Acta Vet Brno 77: 263-267
<https://doi.org/10.2754/avb200877020263>
7. R, Lyman MD, Edelman PG, Campbell PK 2001: Evaluation of the SprayGel adhesion barrier in the rat cecum abrasion and rabbit uterine horn adhesion models. Fertil Steril 75: 411-416
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01677-0>
8. CN, Saed GM, Diamond MP 2015: Predisposing factors to post-operative adhesion development. Hum Reprod Update 21: 536-551
<https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv021>
9. DA, Barrie Edwards G, Proudman CJ 2008: Intra-abdominal adhesions in horses: a retrospective evaluation of repeat laparotomy in 99 horses with acute gastrointestinal disease. Vet J 175: 194-201
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.02.016>
10. A, De Wilde RL 2016: Adhesions are the major cause of complications in operative gynecology. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 35: 71-83
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.10.010>
11. C, Tang F, Wu Q, Guo B, Long WA, Ruan Y, Li L 2021: Novel trilaminar polymeric antiadhesion membrane prevents postoperative pericardial adhesion. Ann Thorac Surg 111: 184-189
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.03.011>
12. S, Fernandez H, Vieille P, Khrouf M, Ulrich D, deTayrac R, Letouzey V 2015: Application of a hyaluronic acid gel after intrauterine surgery may improve spontaneous fertility: a randomized controlled trial in New Zealand White rabbits. PLoS One 10: e0125610
<https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125610>
13. Johnston MS 2005: Rabbit ovariohysterectomy. Clinician’s Brief Web Site. Available at: www.cliniciansbrief.com/columns/53/rabbit-ovariohysterectomy
14. H, Chung YS, Kim SW, Choi GJ, Kim BG, Park SW, Seok JW, Hong J 2015: Effect of temperature-sensitive poloxamer solution/gel material on pericardial adhesion prevention: supine rabbit model study mimicking cardiac surgery. PLoS One 10: e0143359
<https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143359>
15. M 2014: Combined hemostasis and adhesion prevention with the novel agent 4DryField® PH—initial observations. Surg Sci 5: 533-539
<https://doi.org/10.4236/ss.2014.512081>
16. Krämer B, Andress J, Neis F, Hoffmann S, Brucker S, Kommoss S, Höller A 2021: Adhesion prevention after endometriosis surgery - results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial with second-look laparoscopy. Langenbecks Arch Surg, Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34036409
17. B, Riebau C, Mohr J, Pliske G, Walcher F, Piatek S 2021: Effect of 4DryField® PH on blood loss in hip bipolar hemiarthroplasty following intracapsular femoral neck fracture - a randomized clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22: 113
<https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-03983-6>
18. L 2003: Pelvic adhesions: laparoscopic approach. Ann NY Acad Sci 997: 255-268
<https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1290.029>
19. E 2019: Laparoscopic entry techniques: What is the controversy? Vet Surg 48: O6-O14
<https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13220>
20. SA, Treutner KH, Jörn H, Anurov M, Oettinger AP, Schumpelick V 2005: Adhesion prevention comparing liquid and solid barriers in the rabbit uterine horn model. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 120: 222-226
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.09.011>
21. SA, Weis C, Odermatt EK, Knaebel HP, Wente MN 2011: A hydrogel for adhesion prevention: characterization and efficacy study in a rabbit uterus model. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 158: 67-71
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.11.008>
22. D, Katsimpoulas M, Tanoglidi A, Barbatis C, Karayannacos PE, Sergentanis TN, Kostomitsopoulos N, Machairas A 2016: Adhesions and healing of intestinal anastomoses: the effect of anti-adhesion barriers. Surg Innov 23: 266-276
<https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350615610653>
23. H, Minai M, Tsunoda I, Fujii TK, Tsubata K, Satoh K 1999: The effect of hyaluronic acid-carboxymethylcellulose in reducing adhesion reformation in rabbits. J Int Med Res 27: 292-296
<https://doi.org/10.1177/030006059902700605>
24. KE, Hurst BS, Marshburn PB, Matthews ML 2006: Effects of fibrin sealant on single-layer uterine incision closure in the New Zealand white rabbit. Fertil Steril 85: 1261-1264
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.07.1337>
25. M, Lipar M, Smolec O, Pirkic B, Musulin A, Kos J 2017: Changes in haematological indices following local application of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist protein after tenotomy in rabbits. Acta Vet Brno 86: 183-188
<https://doi.org/10.2754/avb201786020183>
26. D, Abbas M, Maegel L, Sambale F, Lavrentieva A, Kreipe HH, Klempnauer J, Winny M 2015: Evaluation of the biological tolerability of the starch-based medical device 4DryField® PH in vitro and in vivo a rat model. J Biomater Appl 30: 463-471
<https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328215592257>
27. D, Grethe L, Maegel L, Jonigk D, Lippmann T, Kaltenborn A, Schrem H, Klempnauer J, Winny M 2016: Evaluation of the effectiveness of peritoneal adhesion prevention devices in a rat model. Int J Med Sci 13: 524-532
<https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.15167>
28. D, Neubert L, Klempnauer J, Borchert P, Jonigk D, Winny M 2019: Comparison of adhesion prevention capabilities of the modified starch powder-based medical devices 4DryField® PH and Arista™ AH in the optimized peritoneal adhesion model. Int J Med Sci 16: 1350-1355
<https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.33277>
29. A, Spedicato M, Mutinati M, Minoia G, Angioni S, Jirillo F, Pantaleo M, Sciorsci RL 2010: Peritoneal adhesions in human and veterinary medicine: from pathogenesis to therapy. A review. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 32: 481-494
<https://doi.org/10.3109/08923970903524367>
30. M, Vogt PM, Müller K, Mett TR 2019: Lymphostasis and hemostasis in body-contouring surgery using a polysaccharide based hemostat (4DryField PH). Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 7: e2128
<https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002128>
31. V, Bapat B, Candrilli SD, Davis KL, Wilson M, Johns A 2011: The inpatient burden of abdominal and gynecological adhesiolysis in the US. BMC Surg 11: 13
<https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-11-13>
32. K, Nakazawa M, Yamazaki H, Miyagawa Y, Ito T, Ishikawa F, Metoki T 2009: Solid hyaluronic acid film and the prevention of postoperative fibrous scar formation in experimental animal eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 127: 460-464
<https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.70>
33. M, Aali S, Khaledifar B, Ferns GA, Khazaei M, Fekri K, Arjmand MH 2021: The potential association between the risk of post-surgical adhesion and the activated local angiotensin II type 1 receptors: need for novel treatment strategies. Gastrointest Tumors 8: 107-114
<https://doi.org/10.1159/000514614>
34. M, Kramářová E, Chloupek J, Najmanová M 2019: Evaluation of stress in laboratory rabbits used for teaching purposes. Acta Vet Brno 88: 249-255
<https://doi.org/10.2754/avb201988020249>
35. BA, de Ree R, van Leuven S, Bakkum EA, Strik C, van Goor H, Ten Broek RPG 2017: Surgical treatment of adhesion-related chronic abdominal and pelvic pain after gynaecological and general surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 23: 276-288
36. Ž, Jurenec F, Karadjole T, Samardžija M, Bačić G, Beck A, Maćešić N 2018: Partial resection of the urinary bladder in swine and sheep and replacement of the resected segment by biologically inert patches. Acta Vet Brno 87: 347-350
<https://doi.org/10.2754/avb201887040347>
37. M, Maegel L, Grethe L, Lippmann T, Jonigk D, Schrem H, Kaltenborn A, Klempnauer J, Poehnert D 2016: Adhesion prevention efficacy of composite meshes Parietex®, Proceed® and 4DryField® PH covered polypropylene meshes in an IPOM rat model. Int J Med Sci 13: 936-941
<https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.16215>

