Acta Vet. Brno 2022, 91: 3-9
https://doi.org/10.2754/avb202291010003
Evaluation of the portio vaginalis of the cervix by B-mode and colour Doppler ultrasound in Simmental cattle
References
1. Akgül A 1997: Statistical analysis techniques in medical researches (in Turkish). Ankara, Turkey: YOK Press.
2. Anonim 2016: SPSS 22.0 statistical package in social sciences for windows. Chicago, USA.
3. 2002: Ultrasonic cervimetry to study the dilatation of the caudal cervix of the cow at parturition. Theriogenology 57: 1989-2002
< VNA, Struijk PC, Eijskoot F, Lotgering FK, van Dissel-Emiliani FMF, Van der Weyden GC, Taverne MAM https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00722-1>
4. 2012: Effect of intrauterine dextrose or antibiotic therapy on reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows diagnosed with clinical endometritis. J Dairy Sci 95: 1894-1905
< T, Schuenemann G, Bas S, Daniels J, Pinto C, Rings D, Rajala-Schultz P https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4892>
5. 2012: Effect of oxytocin infusion on luteal blood flow and progesterone secretion in dairy cattle. J Vet Sci 13: 67-71
< CN, Pancarci MS, Valenci J, Beindorff N, Tsousis G, Kiossis E, Bollwein H https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2012.13.1.67>
6. 2014: Dynamic tissue perfusion measurement in the reproductive organs of the female and male dogs. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 58: 149-155
< M, Scholbach T, Stańczyk E, Ostrowska J, Kinda W, Woźniak M, Kiełbowicz Z https://doi.org/10.2478/bvip-2014-0023>
7. 2016: Comparison of foetal growth in singleton 1 and twin pregnancies by B-mode and Doppler ultrasonography in Karya ewes. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 40: 616-621
< G, Cetin H, Ceylan A, Serin I, Beceriklisoy HB https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-1508-85>
8. Gürler H, Fındık M 2019: Morphology of the female reproductive system (in Turkish). In: Semacan A, Kaymaz M, Fındık M, Rişvanlı A, Köker A (Eds): Obstetrics and Gynecology in Farm Animals (in Turkish). Malatya, Turkey: Medipres, pp. 33-38
9. Kähn W 2004: Veterinary Reproductive Ultrasonography. Schlütersche Verlagsanstalt und Druckerei GmbH und Co, Hannover, Germany, pp. 113-118
10. 2004: Endometrial cytology and ultrasonography for the detection of subclinical endometritis in postpartum dairy cows. Theriogenology 62: 9-23
< R, Duffield TF, Foster RA, Gartley CJ, Leslie KE, Walton JS, Johnson WH https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.03.001>
11. Keskin A, Macun HC 2019: Examination of genital organs (in Turkish). In: Semacan A, Kaymaz M, Fındık M, Rişvanlı A, Köker A (Eds): Obstetrics and Gynecology in Farm Animals (in Turkish). Malatya, Turkey: Medipres, pp. 67-91
12. 2002: Defining and diagnosing postpartum clinical endometritis and its impact on reproductive performance in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 85: 2223-2236
< SJ, Duffield TF, Leslie KE, Bateman KG, Keefe GP, Walton JS, Johnson WH https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74302-6>
13. 2002: Doppler ultrasound. Med J Armed Forces India 58: 1-2
< RS https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-1237(02)80001-6>
14. Mrdjen S 2013: Basic principles of Doppler ultrasonography. In European Congress of Radiology. Poster No. C-0363.
15. 2020: Evaluation of cervical and uterine size, at 4 weeks postpartum, as a predictor of subsequent fertility in Jersey cattle. Reprod Domest Anim 55: 915-921
< SE, Melendez P, Caldeira MO, Moore SG, Mayo LM, Molina-Coto R, Lucy MC https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13702>
16. 2019: The relationship between mastitis and the B-mode, colour Doppler ultrasonography measurements of supramammary lymph nodes in cows. J Dairy Res 86: 315-318
< A, Dogan H, Safak T, Kilic MA, Seker I https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029919000530>
17. 2013: The effect of postpartum PGF2α administration on cervical involution in primiparous cows (in Turkish). Vet Hek Dern Derg 84: 31-35
S, Baştan A, Duraloğlu A
18. 2006: Defining postpartum uterine disease in cattle. Theriogenology 65: 1516-1530
< IM, Lewis GS, LeBlanc S, Gilbert RO https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.08.021>
19. 2011: Evaluation of portal blood flow using transcutaneous and intraoperative Doppler ultrasonography in dairy cows with fatty liver. J Dairy Sci 94: 2964-2971
< A, Schmidt S, Haudum A, Scholbach T, Wohlsein P, Beyerbach M, Rehage J https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4156>