Acta Vet. Brno 2022, 91: 107-114

https://doi.org/10.2754/avb202291010107

Quantitative and qualitative properties of giblets from conventional, organic, and wild ducks

Fouad Ali Abdullah Abdullah, Hana Buchtová

University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, Department of Animal Origin Food & Gastronomic Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic

Received March 4, 2021
Accepted July 26, 2021

References

1. Abdullah FAA, Buchtová H 2016: Comparison of qualitative and quantitative properties of the wings, necks and offal of chicken broilers from organic and conventional production systems. Vet Med 61: 643-651 <https://doi.org/10.17221/286/2015-VETMED>
2. Abdullah FAA, Buchtová H 2017: Quantity and quality properties of breast and thigh of chicken broilers from organic and conventional production systems. Arch Lebensm. Hyg 68: 53-80
3. Abdullah FAA, Buchtová H 2020: Selected freshness indices of skin and wings from organic chicken packaged in modified atmosphere. Acta Vet Brno 89: 97-105 <https://doi.org/10.2754/avb202089010097>
4. Adedeji OS, Amao SR, Oguntunde MM, Dada ID 2014: evaluation of general performance and carcass qualities of organically raised broiler chickens from day old to 12 weeks of age. Int J Agric Innov Res 2: 466-471
5. Alvarez-Astorga M, Capita R, Alonso-Calleja C, Moreno B, Garcia-Fernandez C 2002: Microbiological quality of retail chicken by-products in Spain. Meat Sci 62: 45-50 <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00225-X>
6. Anonymous 2021: Czech Republic duck meat market insights. Selina Wamucii. Available at: https://www.selinawamucii.com/insights/market/czech-republic/duck-meat/. Accessed September 2, 2021
7. Biswas S, Banerjee R, Bhattacharyya D, Patra G, Das AK, Das SK 2019: Technological investigation into duck meat and its products - a potential alternative to chicken. Worlds Poult Sci J 75: 609-620 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S004393391900062X>
8. Castellini C, Mugnai C, Dal Bosco A 2002: Effect of organic production system on broiler carcass and meat quality. Meat Sci 60: 219-225 <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00124-3>
9. Chen X, Jiang W, Tan HZ, Xu GF, Zhang XB, Wei S, Wang XQ 2013: Effects of outdoor access on growth performance, carcass composition, and meat characteristics of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 92: 435-443 <https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02360>
10. Cobos A, Veiga A, Diaz O 2000: Chemical and fatty acid composition of meat and liver of wild ducks (Anas platyrhynchos). Food Chem 68: 77-79 <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(99)00164-8>
11. Commission Regulation 2008: (EC) No 889/2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products with regard to organic production, labelling and control. OJ: L 250: 1-84
12. Darine S, Christophe V, Gholamreza D 2010: Production and functional properties of beef lung protein concentrates. Meat Sci 84: 315-322 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.03.007>
13. Dong NTK, Ogle RB 2000: Effect of brewery waste replacement of concentrate on performance of local and crossbred growing Muscovy ducks. In: Proceedings of “Making better use of local feed resources” SAREC-UAF
14. Dou TC, Shi SR, Sun HJ, Wang KH 2009: Growth rate, carcass traits and meat quality of slow-growing chicken grown according to three raising systems. Anim Sci Pap Rep 27: 361-369
15. Du M, Ahn DU 2002: Effect of dietary conjugated linoleic acid on the growth rate of live birds and on the abdominal fat content and quality of broiler meat. Poult Sci 81: 428-433 <https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.3.428>
16. Fanatico AC, Pillai PB, Emmert JL, Owens LM 2007: Meat quality of slow- and fast-growing chicken genotypes fed low-nutrient or standard diets and raised indoors or with outdoor access. Poult Sci 86: 2245-2255 <https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.10.2245>
17. Faostat 2021: Livestock primary, production quantity, duck meat, 2000 and 2019, Available at: http://www.fao.org/, accessed January 2021
18. Fletcher DL 1999: Broiler breast meat color variation, pH, and texture. Poult Sci 9: 1323-1327 <https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/78.9.1323>
19. Hornsey HC 1956: The colour of cooked cured pork. I.- Estimation of the nitric oxide-haem pigments. J Sci Food Agr 7: 534-540 <https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740070804>
20. ISO 1442 1997: Meat and meat products – Determination of moisture content (Reference method). Czech National Standard CSN, Czech Republic
21. ISO 1443 1973: Meat and meat products – Determination of total fat (Reference method). Czech National Standard CSN, Czech Republic
22. ISO 936 1978: Meat and meat products – Determination of total ash (Reference method). Czech National Standard CSN, Czech Republic
23. ISO 937 1978: Meat and meat products – Determination of nitrogen content (Reference method). Czech National Standard CSN, Czech Republic
24. Izumimoto M 1976: Direct method for assay of haem-pigment in muscle and its application. Nippon Nogeikagaku Kaishi. Japan Soc Biosci Biotech Agrochem 50: 55-59
25. Karunajeewa H, Tham SH 1984: Choice feeding of the replacement pullet on whole wheat grains and subsequent performance on laying diets. Br Poult Sci 25: 99-109 <https://doi.org/10.1080/13632758408454847>
26. Kokoszynski D, Wilkanowska A, Arpášová H, Hrncár C 2020: Comparison of some meat quality and liver characteristics in Muscovy and mule ducks. Arch Anim Breed 63: 137-144 <https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-63-137-2020>
27. Kolluri G, Ramamurthy N, Churchil RR, Sundaresan A, Gawdaman G 2015: Carcass studies in native ducks reared under different housing systems. Ind J Vet & Anim Sci Res 44: 01-11
28. Kowalska AS, Gurkowa K, Kovarník J 2020: Organic Farming in Poland and the Czech Republic - Comparative Analysis, In: Jedlicka P (Eds.): Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference Hradec Economic Days 2020, University of Hradec Kralove, pp. 373-381
29. Ku SK, Hwang SH, Lim SD, Lee KH, Kim YB 2013: Nutritional characteristics and quality changes of duck by-products during frozen storage at -20℃. J Korean Soc Food Sci Anim Resour 33:109-118 <https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2013.33.1.109>
30. Mancinelli AC, Mattioli S, Dal Bosco A, Ciarelli C, Castellini C 2020: Grass intake and meat oxidative status of geese reared in three different agroforestry systems. Acta fytotechn zootechn 23: 308-315
31. Massuquetto A, Panisson JC, Schramm VG, Surek D, Krabbe EL, Maiorka A 2020: Effects of feed form and energy levels on growth performance, carcass yield and nutrient digestibility in broilers. Animal 14: 1139-1146 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119003331>
32. Mikulski D, Celej J, Jankowski J, Majewska T, Mikulska M 2011: Growth performance, carcass traits and meat quality of slower-growing and fast-growing chickens raised with and without outdoor access. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 24: 1407-1416 <https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.11038>
33. Murawska D, Kleczek K, Wawro K, Michalik D 2011: Agerelated changes in the percentage content of edible and non-edible components in broiler chickens. Aust J Agric Res 24: 532-539
34. Regulation 2011. (EU) No 1169/2011 on the provision of food information to consumers, annex XIV. OJ: L 304: 18-63
35. Rembialkowska E, Badowski M 2012: Nutritional value of organic meat and potential human health response. In: Ricke SC, Van Loo EJ, Johnson MG, O’Bryan CA (Eds): Organic Meat Production and Processing. 1st edn. Wiley Scientific/IFT, New York. 239-252
36. Ruiz de Huidobro F, Miguel E, Blazquez B, Onega E 2005: A comparison between two methods (Warner-Bratzler and texture profile analysis) for testing either raw meat or cooked meat. Meat Sci 69: 527-536 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.09.008>
37. Saláková A, Straková E, Válková V, Buchtová H, Steinhauserová I 2009: Quality indicators of chicken broiler raw and cooked meat depending on their sex. Acta Vet Brno 78: 497-504 <https://doi.org/10.2754/avb200978030497>
38. Šejnohová H, Babáčková J, Hlaváčková J, Warthová S 2021: Report on the organic food market in the Czech Republic in 2019. (In Czech). Institute of Agricultural Economics and Information, Brno, Czech Republic, Available at: http://eagri.cz/public/web/file/676190/Zprava_o_trhu_s_biopotravinami_v_CR_v_roce_2019.pdf, accessed September 1, 2021
39. Seong PN, Cho SH, Park KM, Kang GH, Park BY, Moon SS, Ba HV 2015: Characterization of chicken by-products by mean of proximate and nutritional compositions. Korean J Food Sci An 35: 179-188 <https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2015.35.2.179>
40. Sirri F, Castellini C, Roncarati A, Franchini A, Meluzzi A 2010: Effect of feeding and genotype on the lipid profile of organic chicken meat. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 112: 994-1002 <https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.200900204>
41. Trampel DW, Sell JL, Ahn DU, Sebranek JG 2005: Preharvest feed withdrawal affects liver lipid and liver color in broiler chickens. Poult Sci 84: 137-142 <https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.1.137>
42. Wang KH, Shi SR, Dou TC, Sun HJ 2009: Effect of a freerange raising system on growth performance, carcass yield, and meat quality of slow-growing chicken. Poult Sci 88: 2219-2223 <https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00423>
43. Zelenka J 2014: Poultry nutrition and feeding. (in Czech). Vydavatelstvi Agriprint, 1st edn, Olomouc, 160 p.
front cover
  • ISSN 0001-7213 (printed)
  • ISSN 1801-7576 (electronic)

Current issue

Archive