Acta Vet. Brno 2022, 91: 339-346
https://doi.org/10.2754/avb202291040339
The effects of egg yolk-based and egg yolk-free diluents on the post-thaw quality of bull spermatozoa
References
1. VA, Hinsch KD, Mueller-Schloesser F, Bogner K, Mueller-Schloesser S, Hinsch E 2003: In vitro and in vivo comparison of egg yolk-based and soybean lecithin-based extenders for cryopreservation of bovine semen. Theriogenology 60: 269-279
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01369-9>
2. S, Ansari MS, Rakha BA, Andrabi SMH, Iqbal S, Ullah N 2010: Cryopreservation of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) semen semen in Bioxcell® extender. Theriogenology 74: 951-955
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.04.024>
3. S, Berk Toker M, Gokce E, Ustuner B, Tekni Onder N, Sagirkaya H, Nur Z, Kemal Soylu M 2015: Succesful ram semen cryopreservation with lyophilized egg yolk-based extender. Cryobiology 71: 329-333
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2015.08.008>
4. L, Anton M, Tainturier D, Chatagnon G, Battut I, Courtens JL 2005: Modification of bull spermatozoa induced by three extenders: Biociphos, low density lipoprotein and Triladyl, before, during and after freezing and thawing. Reproduction 129: 535-543
<https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.1.00011>
5. SMH 2007: Fundamental principles of cryopreservation of Bos taurus and Bos indicus bull spermatozoa. Int J Agric Biol 9: 367-369
6. J, Stádník L, Bezdíček J, Louda F, Čítek J, Ducháček J 2012: Effect of sire and extender on sperm motility and share of live or dead sperm in bulls’ fresh ejaculate and in AI doses after thawing. Arch Anim Breed 55: 207-218
<https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-55-207-2012>
7. J, Šimoník O, Stádník L, Rajmon R, Ducháček J, Krejcárková A, Doležalová M, Šichtař J 2013: Effect of bull, diluter and LDL-cholesterol concentration on spermatozoa resistence against cold shock. Acta Univ Agric Silvic Mendel Brun 61: 1575-1581
<https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201361061575>
8. ECC, Arruda RP, Andrade AFC, Nascimento J, Raphael CF, Rodrigues PHM 2008: Effects that bovine sperm cryopreservation using two different extenders has on sperm membranes and chromatin. Anim Reprod Sci 104: 119-131
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.02.001>
9. JR, Mansfield LJ, Morris LHA, Evans G, Maxwell WMC 2008: A comparison between freezing methods for the cryopreservation of stallion spermatozoa. Anim Reprod Sci 108: 298-308
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.08.014>
10. PZ, Goolsby HA, Prien SD 2005: Preliminary evaluation of a unique freezing technology for bovine spermatozoa cryopreservation. Reprod Domest Anim 40: 98-99
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2004.00540.x>
11. A, Sá Filho, Dell’Aqua M, Nichi M, Monteiro G, Avanzi B, Martins A, Papa FO 2012: Comparison of in vitro and in vivo fertilizing potential of bovine semen frozen in egg yolk or new lecithin based extenders. Livest Sci 149: 1-6
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.05.011>
12. AM, Nichi M, Guasti PN, Freitas-Dell’Aqua CP, Sa Filho MF, Maziero RR, Dell’Aqua JA Jr, Papa FO 2014: Sperm fertility and viability following 48h of refrigeration: evaluation of different extenders for the preservation of bull semen in liquid state. Anim Reprod Sci 146: 126-133
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.02.020>
13. M, Stádník L, Biniová Z, Ducháček J, Beran J 2015: The effect of freezing curve type on bull spermatozoa motility after thawing. Acta Vet Brno 84: 383-391
<https://doi.org/10.2754/avb201584040383>
14. M, Stádník L, Biniová Z, Ducháček J, Stupka R 2016: Equilibration and freezing interactions affecting bull sperm characteristics after thawing. Czech J Anim Sci 61: 515-525
<https://doi.org/10.17221/23/2016-CJAS>
15. S, Millar JD, Watson PF 2003: The effect of cooling rate on the survival of cryopreserved bull, ram and boar speermatozoa: a comparison of two controlled-rate cooling machines. Cryobiology 46: 246-253
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-2240(03)00040-3>
16. P, Saini M, Kumar D, Balhara AK, Yadav SP, Singh P, Yadav PS 2015: Liposime-based semen extender is suitable alternative to egg yolk-based extender for cryopreservation of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) semen. Anim Reprod Sci 159: 38-45
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2015.05.010>
17. S, Mohanty T, Kumaresan A, Parks J 2016: Cryopreservation of bull semen: evolution from egg yolk based to soybean based extenders. Anim Reprod Sci 172: 1-9
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.04.013>
18. C, Parent S, Leclerc P, Bailey JL, Sullivan R 2000: Cryopreservation alters the levels of the bull sperm surface protein P25b. J Androl 24: 700-707
19. CT, Pérez-Garnelo S, Breńa PB, Palasz A, De la Fuente J, Rodriguez A, Hidalgo C 2008: Freezing of semen from endangered asturiana de la montana bulls in zwitterionic lipid-based extenders. Reprod Fer Dev 20: 161
<https://doi.org/10.1071/RDv20n1Ab162>
20. S, Montserrat Rivera del Alamo M, Álvare-Rodríguez M, Hidalgo CO, Peńa AI, Muińo R, Rodríguez-Gil JE, Mogas T 2020: In vitro assessment of egg yolk-, soya bean lecithin- and liposome-based extenders for cryopreservation of dairy bull semen. Anim Reprod Sci 215: 106315
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106315>
21. E, Purdy PH, Graham JK 2010: Treating ram sperm with cholesterol-loaded cyclodexrtrins improves cryosurvival. Anim Reprod Sci 118: 236-247
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.06.013>
22. R, Fernández M, Peña AI 2007: Post-thaw survival and longevity of bull spermatozoa frozen with an egg yolk-based or two egg yolk-free extenders after an equilibration period of 18 h. Reprod Domest Anim 42: 305-311
<https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00784.x>
23. EM, O’Meara C, Eivers B, Lonergan P, Fair S 2018: Comparison of plant- and egg yolk-based semen dilutents on in vitro sperm kinematic and in vivo fertility of frozen-thawed bull semen. Anim Reprod Sci 191: 70-75
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2018.02.010>
24. AM, Thomson SK, Kaya A, Memili E 2014: Molecular, cellular, and physiological determiants of bull fertility. Turkish J Vet Anim Sci 38: 637-642
<https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-1404-76>
25. FJ, Macias Garcia B, Samper JC, Aparicio IM, Tapia JA, Ortega Ferrusola C 2011: Dissecting the molecular damage to stallion spermatozoa: The way to improve current cryopreservation protocols? Theriogenology 76: 1177-1186
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.06.023>
26. FU, Thao C, Shah MA, Qureshi MS, Wang X 2013: Semen extenders and artificial insemination in ruminants. Veterinaria 1: 1-8
27. FG, Ptáček M, Málková A, Stádník L 2021: Optimizing the conventional method of sperm freezing in liquid nitrogen vapor for Wallachian sheep conservation program. Czech J Anim Sci 66: 55-64
<https://doi.org/10.17221/226/2020-CJAS>
28. AK, Kumar A, Honparkhe M, Kaur S, Kaur H, Ghuman SPS, Brar PS 2018: Comparison of in vitro and in vivo fertilizing potential of buffalo bull semen frozen in egg yolk-, soya bean lecithin-, and liposome-based extenders. Reprod Domest Anim 53: 195-202
<https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13092>
29. G, Noro T, Sylla L, Monaci M 2007. Decrease in glutathione (GSH) content in bovine sperm after cryopreservation: comparison between two extenders. Theriogenology 67: 1249-1255
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.01.009>
30. R, Hurtado M, Jannet F 2002: Comparison of Biociphos-Plus® and TRIS-egg yolk extender for cryopreservation of bull semen. Theriogenology 57: 1087-1094
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00704-X>
31. LM, Watson PF, Holt WV 2002: Semen cryopreservation: a genetic explanation for species and individual variation? Cryo-Lett 23: 255-262
32. PB, Sariozkan S, Bucak MN, Ulutas PA, Akalin PP, Buyukleblebici S, Canturk F 2011: Effect of glutamine and sugars after bull spermatozoa cryopreservation. Theriogenology 75: 1459-1465
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.12.006>
33. MR, Saber Abdelrahman A, Evans HC, Gilmore AA, Hitit M, Arifiantini RI, Purwantara B, Kaya A, Memili E 2019: Advances in cryopreservation of bull sperm. Front Vet Sci 27: 268
<https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00268>
34. K, Rao A, Rao VH, Naidu K, Rao ST 2015: Efficacy of the Tris and Biociphos Plus Extender on the freezability of Punganue bull semen. Indian J Anim Reprod 32: 1-4
35. O, Amirat-Briand L, Bencharif D, Anton M, Desherces S, Schitt E, Thorin C, Tainturier D 2011: Effect of low-density lipoproteins, spermatozoa concentration and glycerol on functional and motility parameters of bull spermatozoa during storage at 4 °C. Asian J Androl 13: 281-286
<https://doi.org/10.1038/aja.2010.84>
36. Y, Sharma RK, Agarwal A 1997: Effect of cryopreservation and sperm concentration on lipid peroxidation in human semen. Urology 50: 409-413
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00219-7>
37. PF 2000: The causes of reduced fertility with cryopreserved semen. Anim Reprod Sci 60-61: 481-492
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00099-3>
38. C, Bozkurt Y, Yavas I 2013: An evaluation of soybean lecithin as an alternative to avian egg yolk in the cryopreservation of fish sperm. Cryobiology 67: 91-94
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2013.05.008>
