Acta Vet. Brno 2024, 93: 239-250

https://doi.org/10.2754/avb202493020239

Deficiencies in livestock holdings with respect to animal welfare identified as part of cross-compliance checks completed in 2016–2020 in the Czech Republic

Michaela Švestková1, Vladimíra Pištěková1, Daniela Takáčová2, Vladimír Večerek1, Eva Voslářová1

1University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, Department of Animal Protection and Welfare and Veterinary Public Health, Brno, Czech Republic
2University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Department of Public Veterinary Medicine and Animal Welfare, Košice, Slovak Republic

Received September 21, 2023
Accepted June 18, 2024

References

1. Averós X, Aparicio MA, Ferrari P, Guy JH, Hubbard C, Schmid O, Ilieski V, Spoolder HAM 2013: The effect of steps to promote higher levels of farm animal welfare across the EU. Societal versus animal scientists’ perceptions of animal welfare. Animals 3: 786-807 <https://doi.org/10.3390/ani3030786>
2. Averós X, Brossard L, Dourmad JY, de Greef KH, Edge HL, Edwards SA, Meunier-Salaün MC 2010: Quantitative assessment of the effects of space allowance, group size and floor characteristics on the lying behaviour of growing-finishing pigs. Animal 4: 777-783 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731109991613>
3. Beattie VE, Walker N, Sneddon IA 1996: An investigation of the effect of environmental enrichment and space allowance on the behaviour and production of growing pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 48: 151-158 <https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(96)01031-3>
4. Bessei W 2006: Welfare of broilers: a review. World Poult Sci J 62: 455-466 <https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS2005108>
5. Broom DM 1986: Indicators of poor welfare. Br Vet J 142: 524-526 <https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1935(86)90109-0>
6. Brscic M, Heutinck LFM, Wolthuis-Fillerup M, Stockhofe N, Engel B, Visser EK, Gottardo F, Bokkers EAM, Lensink BJ, Cozzi G, Van Reenen CG 2011: Prevalence of gastrointestinal disorders recorded at postmortem inspection in white veal calves and associated risk factors. J Dairy Sci 94: 853-863 <https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3480>
7. Council Directive 2008/119/EC of 18 December 2008 laying down minimum standards for the protection of calves (Codified version). Official Journal of the European Union, L 10, January 15, 2009, pp 7-13
8. Council Directive 2008/120/EC of 18 December 2008 laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs (Codified version). Official Journal of the European Union, L 47, February 18, 2009, pp 5-13
9. Council Directive 98/58/EC of 20 July 1998 concerning the protection of animals kept for farming purposes. Official Journal of the European Union, L 221, August 8, 1998, pp 23-27
10. Cozzi G, Brscic M, Gottardo F 2009: Main critical factors affecting the welfare of beef cattle and veal calves raised under intensive rearing systems in Italy: A review. Ital J Anim Sci 8: 67-80 <https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2009.s1.67>
11. Czech Statistical Office 2023: Livestock conditions. Available at: https://vdb.czso.cz/vdbvo2/faces/index.jsf?page=vystup-objekt&pvo=ZEM06A&z=T&f=TABULKA&skupId=2746&katalog=30840&pvo=ZEM06A&evo=v937_!_ZEM06A-19892018_1. Accessed May 28, 2023
12. De Jonge F, Bokkers EAM, Schouten WGP, Helmond FA 1996: Rearing piglets in a poor environment: Developmental aspects of social stress in pigs. Physiol Behav 60: 389-396 <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(96)80009-6>
13. European Council 2003: Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and amending Regulations (EEC) No 2019/93, (EC) No 1452/2001, (EC) No 1453/2001, (EC) No 1454/2001, (EC) 1868/94, (EC) No 1251/1999, (EC) No 1254/1999, (EC) No 1673/2000, (EEC) No 2358/71 and (EC) No 2529/2001. Official Journal L 270, 21/10/2003, pp 1-69
14. Fiems LO, De Campeneere S, Cottyn BG, Vanacker JM, D’Heer BGJ, Boucqué CHV 1999: Effect of amount and degradability of dietary starch on animal performance and meatquality in beef bulls. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 82: 217-226 <https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0396.1999.00235.x>
15. Flower FC, de Passillé AM, Weary DM, Sanderson DJ, Rushen J 2007: Softer, higher-friction flooring improves gait of cows with and without sole ulcers. J Dairy Sci 90: 1235-1242 <https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71612-0>
16. Flower FC, Sanderson DJ, Weary DM 2005: Hoof pathologies influence kinematic measures of dairy cow gait. J Dairy Sci 88: 3166-3173 <https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)73000-9>
17. Fregonesi JA, Leaver JD 2002: Influence of space allowance and milk yield level on behaviour, performance and health of dairy cows housed in strawyard and cubicle systems. Livest Prod Sci 78: 245-257 <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00097-0>
18. Gorden PJ, Plummer P 2010: Control, management, and prevention of bovine respiratory disease in dairy calves and cows. Vet Clin Food Anim 26: 243-259 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2010.03.004>
19. Gottardo F, Fregolent G, Preciso S, Cozzi G, Ra-gno E, Bianchi C, Mazzini C, Andrighetto I 2002: Il benessere dei bovini allevati per la pro-duzione di carne. Inform Agr 58: 35-39
20. Gračner GG, Pavičić Ž, Žužul S, Dovč A, Lončarić N, Grizelj J, Lipar M, Gračner D 2018: Monitoring saliva cortisol level in dairy goats during April, May and July in a semi-intensive rearing system. Vet Stanica 49: 179-185
21. Heinonen M, Oravainen J, Orro T, Seppä-Lassila L, Ala-Kurikka E, Virolainen J, Tast A, Peltoniemi OAT 2006: Lameness and fetility of sows and gilts in radomly selected loose-housed herds in Finland. Vet Rec 159: 383-387 <https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.159.12.383>
22. Hitchens PL, Hultgren J, Frössling J, Emanuelson U, Keeling LJ 2017: An epidemiological analysis of equine welfare data from regulatory inspections by the official competent authorities. Animal 11: 1237-1248 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731116002512>
23. Humer E, Aschenbach JR, Neubauer V, Kröger I, Khiaosa-ard R, Baumgartner W, Zebeli Q 2017: Signals for identifying cows at risk of subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy veterinary practice. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 102: 380-392 <https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12850>
24. Huzzey JM, Veira DM, Weary DM, von Keyserlingk MAG 2007: Prepartum behavior and dry matter intake identify dairy cows at risk for metritis. J Dairy Sci 90: 3220-3233 <https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-807>
25. Johnsen JF, Holmøy IH, Mejdell CM, Ellingsen-Dalskau K, Østerås O, Døsen A, Skjerve E, Nødtvedt A 2021: A cross-sectional study of associations between herd-level calf mortality rates, compliance with legislation on calf welfare, and milk feeding management in Norwegian dairy herds. J Dairy Sci 104: 839-848 <https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18865>
26. Kristensen LS, Primdahl J 2004: Potential for environmental cross-compliance to advance agri-environment objectives. In: Report of Seminar 3 EU Concerted Action Project “Developing Cross-compliance in the EU–Background, Lessons and Opportunitiesˮ
27. Lagoda ME, Marchewka J, O’Driscoll K, Boyle LA 2022: Risk factors for chronic stress in sows housed in groups, and associated risks of prenatal stress in their offspring. Front Vet Sci 9: 883154 <https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.883154>
28. Lay DC, Fulton RM, Hester PY, Karcher DM, Kjaer JB, Mench JA, Mullens BA, Newberry RC, Nicol CJ, O’Sullivan NP, Porter RE 2011: Hen welfare in different housing systems. Poultry Sci 90: 278-294 <https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00962>
29. Lecuelle S, Leterrier Ch, Chagneau AM, Laviron F, Lescoat P, Bastianelli D, Bertin A, Bouvarel I 2011: Experience with a variety of feed colours reduces feed neophobia in the turkey. Appl Anim Behav Sci 135: 78-85 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.08.007>
30. Leiber F, Walkenhorst M, Holinger M 2020: The relevance of feed diversity and choice in nutrition of ruminant livestock. J Sustainable Organic Agric Syst 70: 35-38
31. Madsen TN, Kristensen AR 2005: A model for monitoring the condition of young pigs by their drinking behaviour. Comput Electron Agric 48: 138-154 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2005.02.014>
32. Mann S 2005: Different Perspectives on Cross-Compliance. Environ Val 14: 471-482 <https://doi.org/10.3197/096327105774462719>
33. Meyer C, Matzdorf B, Müller K, Schleyer Ch 2014: Cross Compliance as payment for public goods? Understanding EU and US agricultural policies. Ecol Econ 107: 185-194 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.08.010>
34. Mels C, Niebuhr K, Futschik A, Rault JL, Waiblinger S 2023: Development and evaluation of an animal health and welfare monitoring system for veterinary supervision of pullet farms. Prev Vet Med 217: 105929 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.105929>
35. Ministry of Agriculture 2023: Cross compliance. Available at: https://eagri.cz/public/web/mze/dotace/kontroly-podminenosti-cross-compliance/. Accessed April 23, 2023
36. Němečková M, Popelková T, Chloupek P 2022: Sampling methods for determination of cortisol in pig saliva and their use in the assessment of pig welfare. Acta Vet Brno 91: 261-266 <https://doi.org/10.2754/avb202291030261>
37. Ninčáková S, Večerek V, Válková L, Voslářová E, Kaluža M, Zavřelová V 2022: Health status of slaughtered animals as indicated by postmortem inspection at slaughterhouses. Acta Vet Brno 91: 99-106 <https://doi.org/10.2754/avb202291010099>
38. Orihuela A 2021: Review: Management of livestock behavior to improve welfare and production. Animal 15: 100290 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100290>
39. Popelková T, Němečková M, Tšponová Z, Pištěková V 2022: Factors influencing the welfare of dairy goats. Acta Vet Brno 91: 333-337 <https://doi.org/10.2754/avb202291040333>
40. Schmidt A, Mack G, Möhring A, Mann S, El Benni N 2019: Stricter cross-compliance standards in Switzerland: Economic and environmental impacts at farm-and sector-level. Agric Syst 176: 102664 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102664>
41. Singh AK 2022: A comprehensive review on subclinical mastitis in dairy animals: Pathogenesis, factors associated, prevalence, economic losses and management strategies. Cabi Reviews 2022: 1-16
42. Spoolder HAM, Geudeke MJ, Van der Peet-Schwering CMC, Soede NM 2009: Group housing of sows in early pregnancy: A review of success and risk factors. Livest Sci 125: 1-14 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.03.009>
43. State Veterinary Administration 2021: Information on the animal protection programme - situation in 2020. State Veterinary Administration, Prague, 29 p.
44. Svensson C, Jensen MB 2007: Short communication: Identification of diseased calves by use of data from automatic milk feeders. J Dairy Sci 90: 994-997 <https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71584-9>
45. Švestková M, Pištěková V, Takáčová D, Večerek V, Voslářová E 2024: Analysis of the major deficiencies detected during welfare inspections of farm animals in the Czech Republic. Acta Vet Brno 93: 45-57 <https://doi.org/10.2754/avb202493010045>
46. Veissier I, Miele M, Mounier L 2021: Animal welfare official inspections: farmers and inspectors shared concerns. Animal 15: 100038 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2020.100038>
47. Weary DM, Huzzey JM, von Keyserlingk MAG 2009: Board-invited review: Using behavior to predict and identify ill health in animals. J Anim Sci 87: 770-777 <https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1297>
front cover
  • ISSN 0001-7213 (printed)
  • ISSN 1801-7576 (electronic)

Current issue

Archive