Acta Vet. Brno 2024, 93: 305-312
https://doi.org/10.2754/avb202493030305
Healing efficacy of a novel wound therapy with enrofloxacin-HCl·2H2O/sodium alginate in unresponsive wounds in dogs
References
1. 2015: Wound care. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 45: 1049-1065
< IM, Culp WTN https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2015.04.009>
2. 2015: Composite alginate and gelatin based bio-polymeric wafers containing silver sulfadiazine for wound healing. Int J Biol Macromol 79: 63-71
< J, Burgos-Amador R, Okeke O, Pawar H https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.04.048>
3. 2013: Antimicrobial and antiseptic strategies in wound management. Int Wound J 10(s1): 9-14
< G https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12175>
4. 2012: Clinical efficacy of sodium alginate meshes for the control of infectious dissemination by Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus epidermidis in cavitated wounds with primary healing. Vet Mex OA 4: 285-293
L, Bernard VJ, Tapia BMJ, Gutiérrez PG, Sumano OL
5. 1999: Infection in chronic wounds: controversies in diagnosis and treatment. Ostomy Wound Manage 45: 23-27, 29-40
G, Browne A, Sibbald RG
6. EMEA (European Medicines Agency) 2001: NOTE for guidance on choice of control group in clinical trials
7. 2020: Oral plus topical administration of enrofloxacin-hydrochloride-dihydrate for the treatment of unresponsive canine pyoderma. A clinical trial. Animals 10: 943
< L, Tapia G, Ocampo L, Monroy-Barreto M, Sumano H https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10060943>
8. 2014: Alginate/chitosan-based bi-layer composite membrane as potential sustained-release wound dressing containing ciprofloxacin hydrochloride. Appl Surf Scie 311: 626-634
< F, Dong Y, Song A, Yin R, Li S https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.05.125>
9. 2001: Acceleration of wound contraction and healing with a photocrosslinkable chitosan hydrogel. Wound Repair Regen 9: 513-521
< M, Ono K, Sato M, Nakanishi K, Saito Y, Yura H, Matsui T, Hattori H, Fujita M Kikuchi M, Kurita A https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-475x.2001.00513.x>
10. Kordestani SS 2019: Atlas of Wound Healing: A Tissue Regeneration Approach. 1st Edn, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 180 p.
11. 2017: Reducing sample size in experiments with animals: historical controls and related strategies: Strategies to reduce control group size. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 92: 431-445
< M, Font E https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12237>
12. 2008: Wounds - from physiology to wound dressing. Dtsch Arztebl Int 105: 239-248
P, Michelsen A
13. 2008: Chronic wound infection and antimicrobial use. Adv Skin Wound Car 21: 531-540
< SJ https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000323578.87700.a5>
14. 2022: Real-world data: a brief review of the methods, applications, challenges and opportunities. BMC Med Res Methodol 22: 287-297
< F, Panagiotakos D https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01768-6>
15. 2022: Wound healing in animals: a review of physiology and clinical evaluation. Vet Dermatol 33: 91-e27
< CN https://doi.org/10.1111/vde.13032>
16. 2002: What makes placebo-controlled trials unethical? Am J Bioeth 2: 3-9
< FG, Brody H https://doi.org/10.1162/152651602317533523>
17. 2015: Development and functional characterization of alginate dressing as a potential protein delivery system for wound healing. Int J Biol Macromol 81: 137-150
< FU, Boateng JS, Richardson SCW, Chowdhry BZ, Mitchell JC https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.07.037>
18. 2018: Treatment strategies for infected wounds. Molecules 23: 2392
< I, Grumezescu V, Grumezescu AM https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23092392>
19. 1997: Calcium alginate dressings promote healing of split skin graft donor sites. Acta Chirurgiae Plastic 39: 53-55
JM, Sullivan ST, Beausang ES
20. 2010: Wound types and healing: part two. Vet Times 10: 12-16
L
21. Pavletic MM 2018: Atlas of Small Animal Wound Management and Reconstructive Surgery. 4th Edn, John Wiley & Sons, Nashville, TN, 880 p.
22. 2014: Opportunities and challenges in using studies without a control group in comparative effectiveness reviews: Single group studies in comparative effectiveness reviews. Res Synth Methods 5: 152-161
< JK, Dahabreh IJ, Balk EM, Avendano EE, Lau J, Ip S https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1101>
23. 1992: Alginates. A “new” dressing alternative. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 18: 992-995
< D, Nelson DB https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.1992.tb02773.x>
24. 2021: Alginate and its application to tissue engineering. SN Appl Sci 3: 30
< DR, Biswal T https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-04096-w>
25. 1997: Alginate dressings in wound care management. Nurs Times 93: 49-52
J
26. 1992 Modern wound dressings. 1: Alginates. Z Arztl Fortbild 86: 559-563
KM, Nusser B
27. Sheskin D 2011: Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures. 5th Edn, Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton, FL, London, UK, New York, NY, 1926 p.
28. 2008: Moist wound healing with occlusive dressings: a clinical focus. Derm Surg 27: 175-181
H, Eaglstein MD
29. 2013: Wound cleaning and wound healing: a concise review. Adv Skin Wound Care 26: 160-163
< R, Unverdorben M https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000428861.26671.41>
30. 2010: High prevalence of fluoroquinolone and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolates from canine pyoderma and otitis externa in veterinary teaching hospital. J Microbil Biotechnol 20: 798-802
JH, Yoon JW, Lee SY, Park HM