Acta Vet. Brno 2024, 93: 347-353
https://doi.org/10.2754/avb202493030347
Determination of reproductive response to different synchronization methods and profitability during the transition to anoestrus in multiparous Kangal sheep
References
1. JA, Forcada F, González-Bulnes A 2012: Hormonal control of reproduction in small ruminants. Anim Reprod Sci 130: 173-179
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.01.011>
2. E, Ashour M, El-Kon I, Heleil B, Fattouh ES 2016: Efficacy of various synchronization protocols on the estrus behavior, lambing rate and prolificacy in Rahmani Egyptian ewes during the non-breeding season. Asian J Anim Vet Adv 11: 34-43
<https://doi.org/10.3923/ajava.2016.34.43>
3. H, Abu Gazal B 2018: Different estrous induction protocols during the non-breeding season in Assaf ewes. J Vet Adv 7: 230-236
<https://doi.org/10.14196/sjva.v7i5.2528>
4. PM, Beard AP, Rawlings NC 1999: Ovarian function in ewes at the onset of the breeding season. Anim Reprod Sci 57: 67-88
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(99)00060-3>
5. A, Kamel M 2020: Climatic changes and their role in emergence and re-emergence of diseases. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27: 22336-22352
<https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08896-w>
6. JD, Galligan DT, Thomsen N 1994: Principal descriptors of body condition score in Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci 77: 2695-2703
<https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77212-X>
7. A, Veiga-Lopez A, Garcia P, Garcia-Garcia RM, Ariznavarreta C, Sanchez MA, Tresguerres JAF, Cocero MJ, Flores JM 2005: Effects of progestagens and prostaglandin analogues on ovarian function and embryo viability in sheep. Theriogenology 63: 2523-2534
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.10.013>
8. F, Castonguay FW 2002: Influence of lambing-to-rebreeding interval on ewe reproductive performance in anestrous season. Can J Anim Sci 82: 453-456
<https://doi.org/10.4141/A01-098>
9. N, Ebrahimi M, Ghasemi-Panahi B, HosseinKhani A 2018: Evaluating reproductive performance of three estrus synchronization protocols in Ghezel ewes. Theriogenology 122: 9-13
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.07.005>
10. DL, Wall E 2017: Weather influences feed intake and feed efficiency in a temperate climate. J Dairy Sci 100: 2240-2257
<https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11047>
11. M, Kalantar M, Ahmed JZ, Khan S, Hussain MA, Khan R, Raza SHA 2020: Promoting the reproductive performance and economic indices of Zandi ewes under an accelerated lambing system. Pak J Zool 52: 97-105
12. Lindsay DR 1991: Reproduction in the sheep and goat. In: Cupps PT (Ed.): Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 4th edn, Academic Press, San Diego, pp 491-515
13. P, Lozano M, Hernandez F, Tirado A, Rios-Abellan A, López-Mendoza MC, Gonzalez-Bulnes A 2018: Intravaginal device-type and treatment-length for ovine estrus synchronization modify vaginal mucus and microbiota and affect fertility. Animals 8: 1-8
<https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8120226>
14. A, Neto CDS, Cuadro F 2017: Estrous synchronization treatments in sheep: Brief update. Rev Bras Reprod Anim 41: 340-344
15. JD, Wright PJ 1984: Involution and regeneration of the endometrium following parturition in the ewe. Cell Tissue Res 236: 477-485
16. M, Haile A, Abebe A, Muluneh D, Goshme S, Ben Salem I, Hilali ME, Lassoued N, Chanyalew Y, Rischkowsky B 2016: Gn RH and prostaglandin‐based synchronization protocols as alternatives to progestogen‐based treatments in sheep. Reprod Domest Anim 51: 924-929
<https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.12761>
17. D, Collin A, Yahav S, de Basilio V, Gourdine JL, Collier RJ 2012: Adaptation to hot climate and strategies to alleviate heat stress in livestock production. Animal 6: 707-728
<https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111002448>
18. SL, Beard JK, Hallford DM, Summers AF 2019: Evaluation of estrous synchronization protocols on ewe reproductive efficiency and profitability. Anim Reprod Sci 210: 106191
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.106191>
19. JM 2019: The impact of climate change on extensive and intensive livestock production systems. Anim Front 9: 20-25
<https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfy028>
20. J 2015: Recent advances on synchronization of ovulation in goats, out of season, for a more sustainable production. Asian Pac J Reprod 4: 157-165
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S2305-0500(15)30014-2>
21. AAA, Saadeldin IM, Moumen AF, Ali MA, Ba-Awadh H, Alowaimer AN 2018: Efficacy of using previously used controlled internal drug release (CIDR) insert on the reproductive performance, hormone profiles and economic measures of sheep. Reprod Domest Anim 53: 1114-1122
<https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13212>
22. AAA, Saadeldin IM, Moumen AF, Ali M, Ba-Awadh H, Alowaimer AN 2019: Effects of long-term controlled internal drug release reuse on reproductive performance, hormone profiles, and economic profit of sheep. Rev Bras Zootec 48: 1-10
<https://doi.org/10.1590/rbz4820180085>
23. C, Paganoni B, Milton JTB, Driancourt MA, Martin GB 2011: Pregnancy rate and prolificacy after artificial insemination in ewes following synchronisation with prostaglandin, sponges, or sponges with bactericide. Anim Prod Sci 51: 565-569
<https://doi.org/10.1071/AN10200>
24. XJ, Wang J, Bai YY 2018: Estrous synchronization in ewes: The use of progestogens and prostaglandins. Acta Agric Scand A Anim Sci 68: 219-230
25. HHE, Herrero M, Van Hal O, Röös E, Muller A, Garnett T, Gerber PJ, Schader C, De Boer IJM 2018: Defining a land boundary for sustainable livestock consumption. Glob Change Biol Bioenergy 24: 4185-4194
<https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14321>
26. M, Greyling JPC, Schwalbach LMJ, Muller T, Erasmus JA 2005: Effect of progestagen and PMSG on oestrous synchronization and fertility in Dorper ewes during the transition period. Small Rumin Res 56: 47-53
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2003.12.006>
